A Strong Legal Solution to Arizona’s 2022 Election Fraud Offered by Political Analyst

Political analyst Josh Bernstein has a different and interesting take on how lawyers should handle the rampant ballot fraud that is plaguing Arizona and perhaps other states known for like corruption. Bernstein is known as an insightful news anchor, television talk show host and speaker, especially concerning American conservative causes. He has appeared on well over 4,000 radio programs and at least 50 TV shows as an expert commentator. Please subscribe to his website at https://joshbernsteinuncensored.com/

He advises citizens and politicians who have been scammed with elections to a “Common Law” approach to filing lawsuits, rather than “Administrative Law” pursuit:

Section 1-201 of the Arizona Constitution under the adoption of Common Law states, “as it is consistent with and adopted to the natural and psychical conditions of this state and the necessities of the people thereof, and not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of this state of Arizona and the established customs of the people of this state is adopted and shall be the rule of decision in all courts of this state.”This means every single one of these campaigns can and should file separate lawsuits under Common Law, which is the law of the land, and supersedes the restrictive and unequal justice of Administrative Law. https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00201.htm

In addition, any pending future litigation must include and more importantly prove mal-administration of the election. Any suit must show the election was conducted illegally and violated Article 2, Section 21 of the Arizona Constitution which clearly states, “All elections shall be free and equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at anytime interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.” This is a provable fact that is outcome determinative through signed and notarized affidavits, election worker testimonies, BOD printers that were DISCONTINUED by the manufacturers BEFORE the election but were used anyway, voter disenfranchisement, conflicts of interests by the conductors of the elections, co-mingling of ballots, uncertified machines, equal protection clause violations, etc. Any one of these issues is a provable outcome determinative VIOLATION of Article 2, Section 21 under “free and equal” access to voting rights. https://law.justia.com/constitution/arizona/2/21.htm

Moreover, Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone and any other law enforcement officials who set up armed blockades in front of the MCTEC where votes were being counted also VIOLATED Article 2, Section 21 “No power civil or military, shall at anytime interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.” If we had a real Department of Justice instead of one that protects our Banana Republic perhaps these criminals from Maricopa County would be in a jail cell where they all belong.

And finally, Katie Hobbs, Stephen Richer, and Bill Gates all have VIOLATED A.R.S. 38-503 under “Conflicts of Interests”

“Any public officer or employee who has, or whose relative has, a substantial interest in any decision of a public agency shall make known such interest in the official records of such public agency shall refrain from participating in any manner as an officer or employee in such decisions.”https://www.azleg.gov/ars/38/00503.htm

So when Katie Hobbs refused to recuse herself from overseeing her own election she VIOLATED A.R.S. 38-503 Moreover, Chairman Gates also VIOLATED A.R.S. 38-503 when he didn’t recuse himself due to the Political Action Committee he ran with his partner in crime Stephen Richer. Richer, not only VIOLATED A.R.S. 38-503 but he even VIOLATED the Arizona State Bar Association Rules for Professional Conduct. Ethical Rule 8.4 states, under Section (c) that it is professional misconduct to “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” Section (d) prohibits “conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” Section (e) says an attorney may not “state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.” Richer, a lawyer, opened up an anti-Trump PAC in November of 2021 thus violating the official code of conduct. Don’t worry Stephen the AZ Bar will be receiving my official complaint soon. https://www.azbar.org/for-lawyers/ethics/rules-of-professional-conduct/

Cross-posted with Josh Bernstein Uncensored


____________________

In God We Trust

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack

We are thankful to our incredible sponsors!

Please Support These American Owned Businesses

___________________________

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

For Information

Now Available CLICK Here!

History, Texas, Pioneers, Genealogy

From award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.

_________________________

CLICK: PARK LANE by Rebecca Taylor

3 comments

  1. What happened in Arizona needs to be addressed and I applaud Kari Lake for moving forward with lawsuits against this unlawful and renegade Arizona establishment. I hope she and those affected by the inept and likely corrupt officials get their day in court. Thanks for posting this.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.