History

Why Did Ballots Scanned Offsite Continue to Be Delivered to Maricopa Elections Center After Voting Ended?

Part 2: The Runbeck Connection

Thousands of mail-in ballots in pristine condition in Fulton County, Georgia suddenly showed up after the 2020 presidential election. The same scenario simultaneously occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona.

They were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona. This is the same company local media reported on regarding Rey Valenzuela, elections director, and Kevin Runbeck, owner of the printing company.

Brian Runbeck, a significant employee, has been a prolific financial contributor to Democratic campaigns and causes, records show.

(Note: The reference by Valenzuela has been taken down from the Runbeck website.)

Sworn Testimony

When Rudy Giuliani and Arizona state legislatures held public hearings regarding the Maricopa County election fraud of November 2020, among the most compelling sworn testimonies came from elections witness Jan Bryant.

Her testimony coincided with others and may explain Arizona audit director Ken Bennett’s later revelation that Dominion Voting Systems had refused to comply with a subpoena to turn over passwords to its Maricopa County voting machines.

During the hearing on November 30, 2020, Bryant testified under oath that not even county IT staff were allowed access to the machines.

Bryant witnessed Dominion employees with a laptop computer in the counting room during the six days she worked at the Maricopa County Election Center.

During questioning by Republican state Rep. Mark Finchem, Bryant said there were daily election ballot deliveries to the center by Runbeck Election Services. According to witness testimony, these deliveries happened from Nov. 3 to at least Nov. 10.

Repeated explanations by supervisors at that time was that “Runbeck has high speed scanners,” Bryant said. She was told the ballots were scanned offsite by Runbeck and then delivered to the Maricopa County Election Center.

Transcript Quotes from Bryant’s testimony:

Jan Bryant: …ten days before they quit tabulating they thought they were done. And then more truck loads of ballots would come in. And I’m like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there.

State House Rep. David L. Cook: Mr. Chairman I’m sorry. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT. They thought they were done, and then there was WHAT?

Jan Bryant: They thought they were done multiple times. Multiple times the people that were running the rooms thought they were done (counting ballots), or almost done. Or were gonna be done Wednesday morning (Nov. 4th), then Thursday morning (Nov. 5th), then Friday morning. Then it went on the whole next week. And I’m like, I asked the question, You don’t know how many ballots are still left to come in? I don’t know who does, again…process…project management, but zero.

State House Rep. Mark Finchem: On that point Ma’am, I’m tracking with you but, what day did the truck show up?

Jan Bryant: Every day, yeah, every day.

Mark Finchem: OK. Just a minute. I want to make sure we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on the 3rd, and then the 4th, and then the 5th, and how long did that go on. How many days?

Jan Bryant: I wasn’t there the whole last week. My last day was the 10th and they were still coming in. They were coming from a company called Runbeck, that does the high speed scanning and printing of duplications, and I think the military ballots. And now I’m getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don’t know what they are doing but those ballots are coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that…. apparently you haven’t heard of Runbeck.

Mark Finchem: No, I’ve heard of Runbeck Ma’am. What I’m trying to figure out is whether they printed them or if they scanned them. And if they scanned them offsite, to what purpose?

Jan Bryant: I can’t tell you.

Mark Finchem: Wasn’t that your job to scan them? I mean, not your job, but the (MCTEC).

Jan Bryant: No, all the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck. So, those ballots go to Runbeck. As far as I know there were no observers there. I don’t know. I never got called to work at Runbeck. That’s all I can tell you.

Mark Finchem: No that’s fine. Your observation is useful here. What you’re telling me is the scanning wasn’t actually done on site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else.

Jan Bryant: Where they have very high speed scanners.

Mark Finchem: Right now I really don’t care what the speed is. I want to know were they Dominion scanners?

Jan Bryant: No, no, I don’t think it has anything to do with Dominion.

Mark Finchem: I’m trying to understand what was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment.

Jan Bryant: They were duplicate, duplications. The ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from Military and overseas. But there were more ballots than that. So I don’t know where the rest of them were coming from. Because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don’t know where they were coming from. That’s a question for the county employees to explain to you, where those ballots came from that whole next week. I don’t know where they came from.

Rudy Giuliani: So you were there from Nov. 3rd through the 10th. Seven days later (after election) ballots were still coming in.

Jan Bryant: Yes.

Rudy Giuliani: Were those ballots counted?

Jan Bryant: I watched them go through the tabulation machines. And I watched people working on the adjudication of those ballots.

Rudy Giuliani: And how many ballots…

Jan Bryant: Oh, I don’t know.

Rudy Giuliani: What was the largest number you saw in one day. Just a guess. How many cartons?

Jan Bryant: …there was usually 2 or 3 shifts. I wanna say one day they thought 90,000 was a good number, for a shift. And if they were running multiple shifts a day. It was somewhere between the 3rd and the 10th.

State House Rep. Bret Roberts: I am assuming these were not early ballots in any way shape or form. I’m just kind of curious, did anything stand out to you as far as these new ballots, didn’t know where they were coming from, as far as a physical appearance in any way?

Jan Bryant: No. Everything… they just looked like ballots. Just kept coming. They all came in the same bins.

Runbeck: Democrat Financial Contributor

Kevin Runbeck’s brother, Brian, although not listed on the website as an executive with the company, is an employee of Runbeck Election Services. He has also been a regular financial contributor to Democratic organizations, including Biden for President and Act Blue.

Read More of The Runbeck Connection Series

Part 1: Who Printed Ballots For Fulton County, Georgia and Why is it Important?

Part 3: Plot Thickens For Raffensperger, Kemp, Runbeck, Dominion and China Connections

Follow us on Twitter and Gab @ Texasjackson

________________________

Use this code: https://capital.one/2Tmt9L0 to apply for a Secured Mastercard® by Capital One. *

* JACK DENNIS RECEIVES A REFERRAL BONUS FOR EACH PERSON WHO ACQUIRES A CREDIT CARD FROM THIS OFFER.

68 replies »

    • These were “Duplicated Ballots” you know when they git the sucker Republicans to use those pencils tat kicked them out, or where they printed the Ballots to make them get KICKED OUT of the System when they knew they were sending them to Republican voting district or Military ballots, thus they could ADJUTICATE ( ADJUST THEM, LOL) THEM as they so needed to be adjudicated. These people are so diabolical and evil, they need to be sent to Cuba or China, or better yet Honduras.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Agree this was a very well done presentation. I wish all evidence could be presented in such a manner that a 5 year-old could follow along. The IT stealing via China “packets” needs to be dumbed down so everyone can follow it. The steal was huge, and done on the ground via multiple methods & also via the internet from foreign soil (China)

      Liked by 1 person

  1. The heat must be on. Rey Venezuela endorsement was still on Runbeck website last early last wk.

    Rumor that Runbeck and county had a secret meeting last wk. is this true?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Good work on this. I’ve got some decent connections and will be forwarding this article to a number of folks around the country. People everywhere are focused on AZ like a laser – we need to keep pushing and exposing.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. It’s idiotic to let people cheat in an election. A Fair election is what balances all our individual interests; Lord have mercy, you talk about ripping the fabric of society ?

    Liked by 2 people

    • President Trump gave these scumbags ALL of the rope they needed to hang themselves.
      They through out observers, they counted ballots multiple times, they generated fake ballots…
      But most importantly they all thought they were invincible because NOBODY was prosecuted. They didn’t just get sloppy, they got incredibly over confident that nothing would happen to them as they were protected under the DimWIT crime families.
      President Trump and the WHITE HATS have everything needed to put these people in prison for the rest of their lives to executions. Treason is prosecuted by military tribunals. The President is on the side lines and others are pushing this forward. The Secretary of State for Colorado and Pa said there would be NO more vote audits. Unfortunately for them they don’t see the freight train rolling toward them at a high rate of speed.
      Nobody CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING. Watch them squeal like piglets when the train gets to their dins of criminality. After this is over, few will be stupid enough to try vote fraud again.

      Like

  4. Interesting. I’ve been following this audit everywhere I could.
    Hope you dont mind if I email it to friends and family so we can discuss it.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. https://cleverjourneys.com/2021/06/13/why-did-ballots-scanned-offsite-continue-to-be-delivered-to-maricopa-elections-center-after-voting-ended/
    Another tie in is Runbecks duplicate ballot patent application… link to part one above
    “One obvious question is why would Kevin Runbeck want a patent to generate revised ballots?
    I could understand revising ballots if candidates, dates, locations change prior to an election event and printing of ballots, but how would this prevent tampering, prefilled vote choices and fraud?”

    Liked by 1 person

  6. https://cleverjourneys.com/2021/06/13/why-did-ballots-scanned-offsite-continue-to-be-delivered-to-maricopa-elections-center-after-voting-ended/

    Another tie in is Runbecks duplicate ballot patent application… link to part one above

    “One obvious question is why would Kevin Runbeck want a patent to generate revised ballots?
    I could understand revising ballots if candidates, dates, locations change prior to an election event and printing of ballots, but how would this prevent tampering, prefilled vote choices and fraud?”

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Well, there’s about her company that I’d like to visit and pinch a big ol’ loaf right there in the lobby.

    Like

  8. Too bad the national news media has already declared this a debunked conspiracy theory (when they deign to notice it at all) and since it says right in the Constitution that the national news media has the authority to declare who the winner of the election is there’s nothing you can do about it.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. I am glad to see patriots standing tall and fearlessly pushing for the whole unvarnished truth to come out about these election shenanigans, Kudos. Its been like pulling teeth the whole time and the feckless Democrats have been totally unwilling to help seek out the truth. They must have a whole lot to hide?

    Liked by 2 people

  10. I’m sure you are aware but this is currently the lead article on the Citizen Free Press “stack.” This site is exploding and replaced Drudge as a “go to” news aggregator site for many people some time ago.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. This election, stolen or not, was clearly tampered with. Election-tampering is a crime more serious than treason. It should be considered a capital crime, and anyone convicted of that crime, should at the very least, be stripped of their citizenship.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. “Why did ballots scanned off site continue… ”

    Because they were cheating. This isn’t challenging to grasp.

    Like

  13. Discussing chain of custody: video

    Discusses after 7:30 mark that the sharif department involved in guarding or there when vault of ballots opened? Is this part of chain of custody as outlined by law?

    Would the sherif department be involved and have direct knowledge of the ballots moving from Runbeck to county tabulators between January 3-10th as described in sworn testimony. How does this all tie in? Or am I premature in asking question

    Liked by 1 person

    • Your questions are all good. We think similar. My wife calls me a cipherer because I’m always deciphering, investigating and almost intuitive-like in where to look. I think years of private investigation & investigative reporting honed the skills. Also, I see those qualities in business owners & leaders who’ve had to be strategic, analytical who believe in their hunches.

      Like

  14. Just wanted to let you know that the whole world is watching. I’m from Germany and really appreciate your great work. When this whole thing explodes in their faces, not only will it shake the USA to the core but the whole world.
    Sure hope the stinking swamp over here will get cleaned up, too.
    Hugs from Germany!

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Perhaps this has already been mentioned … but let’s not forget about the memo from Kelly Dixon INSISTING that sharpie pens be used on election day (sharpies often caused ballots to be rejected by the machines – requiring manual adjudication). She said in the memo to use ballpoint pens on days leading up to election day but to make sure that all precincts only used sharpies ON election day. https://nationalfile.com/leak-email-allegedly-from-maricopa-elections-office-found-issue-with-sharpies-said-use-them-on-election-day-anyway/

    Like

  16. Nicely done, and good info. Facebook refused to allow me to share, though. Disgusting fake checkers over there! I think I may have to take the time away from monitoring audit cameras to post this stuff on my blog, and share it from there, giving you all credit. Wonder if they will then ban my blog, too. LOL! I’ve not had time to blog lately….too busy! Thanks for all this!

    Like

  17. I think every one of them should be tried for treason and put Stacey Abrams in it too I think she is still mad that she did not win in ga that she is trying to destroy it and for sure she has knocked herself out of getting voted for again because she is a traitor with fatten edger and Kemp and the others why don’t she take some of this dirty money and fix her teeth and she has shown she is a traitor and we know without a shadow of doubt she should be sent to gitmo and I think all of these defrauders. Should go down in treason. This was cruel how they treated our great president but you know what goes around comes around and god will undertake

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s