Pandemic: Health, Greed, Money, Science, or Depopulation?

The truth is hospitals were paid an extra 20% on a patient’s entire bill if they were ventilated and diagnosed with COVID. It was common knowledge to many hospital administrators, doctors and nurses that Ivermectin/ HCQ worked.

Did they purposely suppress and attack these effective medications? Why? Was it all about money, health, bogus science, or did depopulation play a part?

Here is what we have learned since the pandemic began on or around September 12, 2019.

Please Support These American Owned Businesses

___________________________

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

___________________________

Now Available CLICK Here!
From award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.

5 thoughts on “Pandemic: Health, Greed, Money, Science, or Depopulation?

    1. Wer von der Lüge lebt, stirbt an der Wahrheit.

      Those who live by lies die by the truth.

      Los que viven de la mentira mueren de la verdad.

      Don’t let lies make you sick. The truth makes us strong.

      Follow THE TRUTH.

      Thank You Dawn🌹

      Liked by 2 people

  1. I’m not a Doctor, but I felt confident the following is True. This “Perspective” was published in October of 2020, based on principles known way before that. Yet they pushed and continue to push the vaccine that is causing exactly what this Perspective says it’s likely to. Homicide Charges against the Regulatory Agencies should apply, the loss of their pensions, the loss of their jobs, and appropriate prosecution will be the beginning of Justice needed to correct this heinous time in history. The planners of it will need to be routed out and prosecuted as well.

    Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.13795

    “Results of the study
    COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

    Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications
    The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s