The True Story Behind the FBI, DOJ Raid on President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Estate

It is wise for Americans to turn off mainstream media and not pay attention to the propaganda they will be churning out in regards to the FBI raid on President Donald Trump’s Florida home.

The best estimates (based on plummeted media ratings, the disgraceful Spygate operation, the January 6 Insurrection hoax, true voting tabulations, etc.) are that at least 72 percent of citizens no longer trust all three branches of federal government, the media and especially the Deep State three-letter departments (DOJ, FBI, CIA, CDC, FDA, EPA…).

Monday’s FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate is unprecedented and similar to previous attempts to cancel his power, patriotism, election victory and their disrespect for the U.S. Constitution.

Specifically, the New World Order, World Economic Forum and Deep State puppets are afraid of him. It is imperative–the writing is on the wall–Trump would likely win if he elects to run for president again in 2024.

1. They need to know what proof he has against them.

2. They need to understand his plans against them.

3. Similar to their made up dossier and past false accusations, they need to create more “evidence” to protect themselves and get him out.

Nevermind the free passes for the Clinton and Biden Crime Families, the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile client list and Ukraine/China money laundering kickbacks, they need to produce more false flags, media narratives and fabricated evidence to shut Trump down.

Under the guise of looking for “classified documents,” most Americans, at this point, would not believe any so called evidence the DOJ would use against Trump due to their corrupt past.

Popular meme


Millions more Americans now recognize the pattern, their predictable “Mode of Operation.”

Rather than go over the long history of illegal espionage, failed attempts to get him out of office and details of the coup activities against Trump and the American people, here are some relevant highlights to consider:

🔹Trump is the only potential candidate known to not be influenced by the Deep State. There are likely others, but then again we bought in to Romney, McCain, Crenshaw and even Pence. We are far more cautious and educated now.

🔹The Biden Regime dubiously claimed it had no advance knowledge of the raid, which has overwhelmingly been characterized by Republicans as politically motivated. Who believes the Barack Obama-Susan Rice-George Soros led White House anymore?

🔹Nancy Pelosi’s recent Jan. 6 televised witchhunt spectacle backfired.

🔹The far-left judge who signed the warrant to raid Trump’s home was none other than Bruce Reinhart.

According to the Miami Herald, Reinhart began representing Jeffrey Epstein’s employees on January 2nd, 2008, just one day after departing the U.S. Attorney’s Office where he served as an assistant U.S. attorney closely involved on the convicted pedophile’s case.

Accused of leveraging “inside information about Epstein’s investigation to curry favor with Epstein,” in 2011, he was named as a prosecutor who allegedly violated the rights of an underage girl whom Epstein solicited sex from in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit.

Reinhart appears to have exploited his role in the U.S. Attorney’s Office to launch a private criminal defense practice, according to the Miami Herald:

“On Oct 23, 2007, as federal prosecutors in South Florida were in the midst of tense negotiations to finalize a plea deal with accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a senior prosecutor in their office was quietly laying out plans to leave the U.S. attorney’s office after 11 years. “On that date, as emails were flying between Epstein’s lawyers and federal prosecutors, Bruce E. Reinhart, now a federal magistrate, opened a limited liability company in Florida that established what would become his new criminal defense practice.”

Reinhart insisted that he never represented Epstein himself — “only Epstein’s pilots; his scheduler, Sarah Kellen; and Nadia Marcinkova, described by some victims as Epstein’s sex slave.”

🔹Trump filed a federal RICO suit in Miami, Florida Thursday, March 24, 2022 against none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton and her cohorts over the Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.

🔹Trump is seeking treble damages of expenses and losses of more than $24 million.

🔹The Defendants are Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee, DNC Services Corporation, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie
Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robert E. Mook, Phillipe Reines,

Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Business Intelligence, Ltd., Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Neustar, Inc., Rodney Joffe,

James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith, Andrew McCabe, “John Does 1 through 10 (said names
being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC Corporations 1 through 10 (said names being fictitious and unknown entities) and alleges as follows:”

“In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”

“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme—falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement,
and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources – are so outrageous, subversive and
incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison.

“Under the guise of ‘opposition research,’ ‘data analytics,’ and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public’s trust. They worked together
with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump. Indeed, their far-reaching conspiracy was designed to cripple Trump’s bid for presidency by fabricating a scandal that would
be used to trigger an unfounded federal investigation and ignite a media frenzy.”

“To start, the Clinton Campaign and the DNC enlisted the assistance of their shared counsel, Perkins Coie, a law firm with deep Democrat ties, in the hopes of obscuring their actions under the veil of attorney-client privilege.”

“Perkins Coie was tasked with spearheading the scheme to find—or fabricate—proof of a sinister link between Donald J. Trump and Russia.”

To do so, Perkins Coie launched parallel operations:

–on one front, Perkins Coie partner Marc Elias led an effort to produce spurious ‘opposition research’ claiming to reveal illicit ties between the Trump Campaign and Russian operatives;

–on a separate front, Perkins Coie partner Michael Sussmann headed a campaign to develop misleading evidence of a bogus ‘back channel’ connection between e-mail servers at Trump Tower and a Russian-owned

Marc Elias, in his mission to obtain derogatory anti-Trump ‘opposition research,’ commissioned Fusion GPS, an investigative firm, and its co-founders, Peter Fritsch and Glenn
Simpson, and directed them to dredge up evidence—actual or otherwise—of collusion between Trump and Russia.

Fritsch and Simpson, in turn, enlisted the assistance of Orbis Ltd. and its owner, Christopher Steele, to produce a series of reports purporting to contain proof of the supposed collusion.

Of course, the now fully debunked collection of reports, known as the “Steele Dossier,” was riddled with misstatements, misrepresentations and, most of all, flat out lies.

In truth, the Steele Dossier was largely based upon information provided to Steele by his primary
sub-source, Igor Danchenko, who was subsequently indicted for falsifying his claims.

Even more damning, Danchenko had close ties to senior Clinton Campaign official, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., who knowingly provided false information to Danchenko, who relayed it to Steele, who reported it in the Steele Dossier and eagerly fed the deceptions to both the media and the FBI. This duplicitous arrangement existed for a singular self-serving purpose – to discredit Donald J. Trump and his campaign.

At the same time, Michael Sussmann, in his hunt for damaging intel against the Trump Campaign, turned to Neustar, Inc., an information technology company, and one of its top executives, Rodney Joffe, a fervent anti-Trumper who had recently been promised a high ranking position with the Clinton Administration, to exploit their access to non-public data in search of a
secret “back channel” connection between Trump Tower and Alfa Bank.

When it was discovered that no such channel existed, the Defendants resorted to truly subversive measures – hacking servers at Trump Tower, Trump’s private apartment, and, most alarmingly, the White House.

This ill-gotten data was then manipulated to create a misleading “inference” and submitted to law
enforcement in an effort to falsely implicate Donald J. Trump and his campaign.

All of these acts were carried out in coordination with the Clinton Campaign and the DNC, at the behest of certain Democratic “VIPs.”

While their multi-pronged attack was underway, the Defendants seized on the opportunity to publicly malign Donald J. Trump by instigating a full-blown media frenzy.

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack

We are thankful to our incredible sponsors!

Please Support These American Owned Businesses


Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!


For Information

Now Available CLICK Here!

History, Texas, Pioneers, Genealogy

From award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.


  1. I’m Canadian and have been following this garbage from the get go. I’m a Trump supporter from Day One. Thoroughly disgusted with some of these RINOs in power. I pray for Trump 2024 if he runs. Our lips to God’s ears help us.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. A lesson on Language:

    Of the Press Secretary, she said, at the Press Briefings:

    “”No one at the White House was given a heads up. That did not happen.””

    If Biden was not at the White House, but was advised on the raid, the statement is true. Since Biden is not at the White House often, it’s subterfuge.

    If she said Joe Biden and Harris were not advised, but only Joe was, it’s still True to say “Biden and Harris” were not advised.

    At work, employees were exposed to a chemical. Nothing serious. Bosses were away, but the slip showing the levels tested in the area was on the boss’s desk. I took the slip, gave it to one of the employees, he made a copy, and I put it back.

    I was a Union Rep, I was called to the office. I was told there was no chemicals present. I said “that’s not what the slip said”. He said “what slip?” I pointed to it. First thing he said was “Did you make a copy of the slip?” I said no, and in point of fact, I did not make a copy. He asked more questions, then incredibly said “did anyone make a copy of the slip?” Before I could answer, the area boss pulled the questioner away and the area boss talked to me. He said that because of the way the test was taken, it read much higher than it should. Technical details aside, I believed him and talked to the employees. OSHA requires a blood test and follow up for the exposure, the company followed the standard and acted properly.

    Why did I bore everyone with this story? Because I was telling the truth when I said I did not make copies though I took it to them to for them to make copies. Much of what the govt says is word play.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.