The truth is 9/11 did occur. It did, of course, happened, but are the mainstream media and government narratives truthful?
A piece of the puzzle that stands out the most for me is the absolute impossiblity for Building 7 to have fallen suddenly, symmetrically, and in free fall for 2.5 seconds due to any natural sequence of structural failures.
Ten years later, after multiple investigations and careful studies, even the National Institute of Science Technology revealed that both video and photographic evidence indicate that there were no fires in the northeast corner of the 12th floor of Building 7 for at least 90 minutes prior to the collapse.
Yet somehow NIST alleges today that the collapse was triggered by the thermal expansion of floor beams at the northeast corner of the 13th floor. Here is why I can’t trust this conclusion.
- For at least 90 minutes prior to the collapse there were no fires in the area where the failure allegedly occurred.
2. The girder that NIST alleges was pushed off of its bearing seat would have become trapped inside the side plate of the adjoining column if heated and pushed westward.
3. The beam framing into the girder could not have expanded enough to push the girder off of its seat.
4. The web stiffener on the girder would have prevented it from walking off of its seat. NIST admits to having omitted the web stiffener from its modeling.
At 5pm on the afternoon of September 11 2001, the BBC aired a live broadcast about the collapse of Building 7 (The Salomon building). After introducing the topic, the anchor interviewed reporter Jane Standley at her base in New York, who described how the building had fallen. Halfway through the interview, the video link was suddenly lost.
That was convenient, really, because at the time of airing the report, WTC7 had not yet fallen. In fact, it would not fall for another 23 minutes, and it can clearly be seen to the top right of Standley as she conducts the interview.
The BBC claimed that the satellite feed had an electronic timer that cut out at exactly 5.15pm, five or so minutes before the building collapsed for real. The tapes containing the report mysteriously vanished, only to come to light again several years later.
I have flown on literally hundreds of flights over the years and always found it necessary to wait at least until we landed or at very low altitudes.
It is exceedingly improbable that all eight pilots on the four airliners would have failed to enter the universal hijack code into their transponders and that all of them would have either given up control of the aircraft or been incapacitated without first performing a violent flight control maneuver to thwart an invasion of the cockpit.
Possibly recognizing this problem, the FBI unveiled a new story during the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, claiming that all of the calls — except for two allegedly made at a lower altitude of 5,000 feet — were made from seat-back phones.
However, in the case of two passengers whom the FBI later alleged made calls from seat-back phones, there is good evidence that the calls were made from the passengers’ cell phones.
• In the case of UA 175 passenger Brian Sweeney, he left a message on the answering machine at his home, and his wife reported — apparently based on the information from the answering machine — that he had called from his cell phone.
2. In the case of UA 93 passenger Tom Burnett, his wife was interviewed by the FBI just hours after receiving multiple calls from him, which she reported were made from his cell phone.
As stated in the FBI report of that interview, “[Deena] Burnett was able to determine that her husband was using his own cellular telephone because the caller identification showed his number, 925-980-3360.”
UA 93 was allegedly at 35,000 feet and 40,700 feet, respectively, at the time of two of Burnett’s calls — altitudes that would have made the calls impossible.
Furthermore, regarding the two lone calls claimed by the FBI to have been made from cell phones at 5,000 feet — allegedly placed by UA 93 flight attendant CeeCee Lyles and UA 93 passenger Edward Felt — it is unlikely that even those two calls could have been completed at that altitude.
To receive free email notification, when we post new articles like this, sign up below. Clever Journeys does & will not sell or share your information with anyone.
In God We Trust
______________
Please Support This Stellar American Owned Business
Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!
Green Pasture Here
HEB Food/Drugs
Clever Journeys 
There should have been the wake up call for all. I was slow and it was also building 7 for me that started my awakening . Building 7 was something I couldn’t ignore.
Have you ever seen the Silverstein interview, The boot leg copy of his interview . Silverstein was the owner that received all the insurance money. ‘building 7 at 4:00 in the afternoon…. It was decided that we needed the “pull” The building, as we couldn’t save it.’ Silverstein didn’t understand that it takes a weeks of planning and preparation to pull a building / to implode a building.
shortly after this, the same person that introduced some of the 911 evidence to me, gave me a bootleg copy of the Franklin scandal documentary that PBS had almost completed. someone came in and purchased the rights to make sure everything was destroyed rather than air. America never was fully introduced to the deep state apparatus. How the world would have been different if the Franklin scandal would have been fully exposed back in the 80’s
LikeLike