Dr. Paul Thomas, a prominent Pediatrician, studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health outcomes.

His data showed:
Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4× higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher
Asthma – 5.2× higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher
Sinusitis – 4.3× higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher
Anemia – 5.5× higher
Eczema – 4.5× higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher
Dermatitis – 1.4× higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher
Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group

Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.

Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?
To receive free email notification, when we post new articles like this, sign up below. Clever Journeys does & will not sell or share your information with anyone.
In God We Trust

______________







Yes, “Why?” Those people ought to answer that question, shouldn’t they? This exposure will help other people think about that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Follow the money. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely to both of you! 😉
LikeLike