The dangerous fifth generation, 5G, of radiofrequency (RF) radiation is about to be implemented globally. This is occurring without proper investigation of the risks to human health and the environment.

This has led to serious concerns from experts in numerous countries.

It is important to remember that Wuhan, China is where COVID started. Recall that with 5G technology in Wuhan, it was Konnech Inc., the election management company that was linked, via databases and software investigations, directly to Wuhan.

On July 15, 2016, then President Barack Obama made a significant and suspicious commitment. Just one day after the FCC voted to adopt new 5G wireless technology, health advocates called it unsafe. He then committed $400 million to 5G “research.”

Obama noted that the National Science Foundation was then funded by $7 billion in government funds. It would pledge $50M over the following five years. This pledge was part of an $85M investment. NSF and private sector companies contributed to this “to build the testing platforms starting with the 2017 fiscal year.”

NSF was also committing $350M over the next seven years. This funding will “take research from the concept phase to real-world testing at scale,” he said.

Health advocates noted at the time that health and environmental considerations were absent from Obama’s statement.

They also wondered if politics was involved since Obama had come out in support of Hillary Clinton as President and she has expressed strong support of 5G technology in a position paper.

Her support of 5G has drawn the ire of Wi-Fi health advocates who say she ignores radiation’s health effects.

Her position paper said:

“Hillary will accelerate this progress and help foster the evolution to 5G, small cell solutions, and other next-generation systems that can deliver faster wireless connections. Widely deployed 5G networks, and new unlicensed and shared spectrum technologies, are essential platforms that will support the Internet of Things, smart factories, driverless cars, and much more—developments with enormous potential to create jobs and improve people’s lives.”

“Devastating to Health”

“The proposed 5G Spectrum Frontiers is a boon to industry and a devastation to our health,” says Parents for Safe Technology under the headline, “Take action against 5G now!!!”

Joe Esposito of EMF Safety Network said there is a palpable danger from “untested 28GHz radiation blasting from millions of new hidden antennas and tuned-up ‘smart’ meters.”

He described it as “a corporate free-for-all, with oversight eliminated, total, for-profit surveillance, an ‘internet of everything’ with ‘hundreds of billions of microchippable products,’ everywhere and everything… and eventually, everyone.”

“Our Government and industry,” said Esposito, “have come together for control and profits at huge expense to the public’s health and their physiological existence. Wireless ‘smart’ utility meters represent the same kind of threat. 5G is smart meters on steroids or full warp speed ahead.”

“Electricity was supposed to be inside wires,” he said. “Wireless is simply raw electricity outside of wires being blasted at everyone. The reality of wireless is that everyone is being ‘subtly electrocuted’.”

He asks if the FCC will place 5G small cells without public consent wherever it wants. This is similar to what it has done with cell towers. He also wonders whether the public will be allowed to sue the owners due to health effects. Finally, he questioned whether 5G small cells would be forcibly installed in homes.

Mary Adkins, Rhode Island Director for Citizens for Safe Technology, said in a filing to the FCC that “5G is a death sentence for the millions being crippled by wireless radiation.”

The health issue is so vital to Deep State and the World Economic Forum (including WHO, the World Health Organization) interests that an appeal to the European Union (EU) in September 2017 was presented by almost 400 scientists and medical doctors. A moratorium on 5G deployment was requested until serious and proper scientific evaluation of potential negative consequences was conducted.

The urgent appeal and request by the doctors and health scientists was not even acknowledged by the EU. An assessment of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology was overlooked in a Swiss government expert group’s report.

It was also ignored in a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Much like the conflicts of interest tied to Big Pharma and Big Energy, these same type of scams contribute to the deliberate ignorance of the 5G reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk.

All too familiar, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees and reinforcing the no-risk paradigm.

US government reports from the 1970s to 1980s provided evidence for many neuropsychiatric effects. These effects are associated with non-thermal microwave EMFs. The studies were based on occupational exposure.

Twenty-two more recent epidemiological studies provide substantial evidence. Microwave EMFs (especially 5G technology) from cell/mobile phone base stations can produce similar patterns of neuropsychiatric effects. Excessive cell/mobile phone usage and wireless smart meters also show these effects. 

Among the more commonly reported changes are sleep disturbance or insomnia.

•Other common changes include headache, depression or depressive symptoms, and fatigue or tiredness.

• Dysesthesia and concentration or attention dysfunction are also noted. Patients report memory changes, dizziness, and irritability.

• There is also a loss of appetite or body weight, restlessness or anxiety, and nausea.

• Additionally, skin burning, tingling or dermographism, and EEG changes are reported. 

Many believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct.

Most politicians and other decision-makers use WHO ‘guidelines’ for exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation. They seem to ignore the risks to human health. Additionally, they overlook the risks to the environment.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization (WHO). It classified RF radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz to 300 GHz. It was classified as a ‘possible’ human carcinogen in May 2011. This classification is being ignored. This has been recently exemplified in a hearing at the Tallinn Parliament in Estonia.

Individuals and organizations with inborn conflicts of interests (COIs) are influencing politicians. They have their own agenda in supporting the no-risk paradigm.

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has repeatedly ignored scientific evidence. This evidence shows the adverse effects of RF radiation on humans and the environment.

Their guidelines for exposure are based solely on the thermal (heating) paradigm. They were first published in ICNIRP 1998. These were updated in ICNIRP 2009 and have later published in ICNIRP 2020. There is no change of concept, as they only rely on thermal effects from RF radiation on humans.

The large amount of peer-reviewed science on non-thermal effects has been ignored in all ICNIRP evaluations. Additionally, ICNIRP has successfully maintained their obsolete guidelines worldwide.

COIs can be detrimental, and it is necessary to be as unbiased as possible when assessing health risks. There are three points that should be emphasized:

1. The evidence regarding health risks from environmental factors may not be unambiguous, and therefore informed judgements must be made. There are gaps in knowledge that call for experienced evaluations, and no conclusion can be reached without value judgements.

2. Paradigms are defended against the evidence and against external assessments by social networks in the scientific community.

3. Decisions about health risks have a strong impact on economic interests. They also affect military and political interests. The stronger these impacts, the more stakeholders will try to influence these decision processes.

The IARC evaluation was conducted in 2011. Since then, the evidence on human cancer risks from RF radiation has been strengthened. This is based on human cancer epidemiology reports, animal carcinogenicity studies, and experimental findings on oxidative mechanisms and genotoxicity. Thus, the IARC Category should be upgraded from Group 2B to Group 1, a human carcinogen.

The deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, of RF radiation is a major concern in numerous countries. Many groups of citizens are trying to implement a moratorium. They want thorough research on adverse effects on human health and the environment to be performed first.

Recall the appeal for a moratorium (signed by over 390 international scientists and medical doctors) was sent to the European Union (EU) in September 2017. To this day the EU has not responded.

Several regions have implemented a moratorium on the deployment of 5G. This decision is motivated by the lack of studies on health effects. For instance, in Geneva.

Chinese Influence Again

Going back to 5G technology in Wuhan, China, recall it was Konnech Inc., the election management company that was linked, via databases and software investigations, directly to Wuhan.

• Also note that (as a response to the 911 attacks and the set up of a Homeland Security Department) a First Responder Network Authority was developed under the Department of Commerce to oversee the build-out of something called “FirstNet.”

It was developed to serve police, fire, and emergency services with special nationwide coverage that used a dedicated cellular band portion known as Band 14. 

Under Obama, the scope expanded to include all “critical infrastructure” – which included water, energy, and transportation infrastructure.

Just before Obama left office, under the guise of the RussiaGate hoax against incoming President Donald Trump, elections systems suddenly rolled into the critical infrastructure designation.

•It was necessary to install 5G (remember Wuhan) technology as fast and furious as possible to election systems to initiate vote switching in 2020 and beyond.

It is critical to note electronic poll pads, election management systems, and tabulators had internet connection capabilities!

•Just about as fast as the CDC, FDA and Anthony Fauci’s NIAID Department could muster up COVID-19 bioweapon jabs with Big Pharma, the US Election Assistance Commission (EAD) Board of Advisers met in April 2019 to fast track cellular/internet capabilities for elections.

The end result of this meant many voting machines throughout the US were not properly certified at the time of the 2020 Election by accredited voting system testing labs.

•Event 201 was held almost simultaneously. It was sponsored by the World Economic Forum and the Bill Gates Foundation. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health and Security hosted it to allow bureaucratic operatives to practice mock-ups and propaganda. They aimed to control narratives during their “hypothetical worldwide pandemic” that would soon actually begin in reality.

•Behind the scenes, major telephone cell carriers (AT&T, Verizon, etc.) were transforming and upgrading their systems to Cradlepoint (which gave manipulation control) so that they could have real-time voter count and voting results sent back to data centers—so voting manipulation could occur.

“This data can be remotely changed by a man-in-the-middle operating on the FirstNet network,” reveal election investigator Charles Bernardin. “In fact, the election results can be entirely fabricated with this clandestine configuration, and nobody would know.”

receive free email notification, when we post new articles like this, sign up below. Clever Journeys does & will not sell or share your information with anyone.

☆☆☆☆☆

IN GOD WE TRUST

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack

CLICK HERE for GREEN PASTURE BENEFITS

Use Code CLEVER10 for a 10% discount on Green Pasture products today!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

GREENPASTURE.ORG

☆☆☆☆☆

Pre-order Now:

Pre-order Now

Well of Deception

☆☆☆☆☆

By award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.

See details here!