Boycott

If You Are Considering Taking the Experimental Vaccine Under Threat of Losing Your Job, Try This First

There are basically three recommended strategies to tip more odds in your favor if you are under the threat of being terminated for not taking the experimental COVID “vaccines.”

STRATEGY #1

1. Hire an attorney to a) defend you in court, b) sue your employer, c) start or join a file class action lawsuit with others and attorneys. You might find an attorney here.

STRATEGY #2

2. Don’t quit. Wait to be terminated so you can sue or counter your employer’s bluff.

STRATEGY #3

Document. Document. Decline the experimental “vaccines” and document.

This strategy is NOT to necessarily refuse the “vaccine,” but send a letter similar to the following (or have your attorney send one), preferably certified and signature required, showing your employer your conditional acceptance.


I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.


I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:


1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?


2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?


3. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since its introduction?


4. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?


5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?


6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?


7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.


2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures. Have it notorized to ensure legality.


3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?


4. I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.

They likely CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused their request nor their bullying (whatever the case may be) to have the “vaccination.”

Note: Always seek legal advice and opinion from a qualified attorney registered to practice law in your state.

___________________________

Please Support These American Owned Businesses

___________________________

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

___________________________

Now Available CLICK Here!
From award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.

9 replies »

  1. In the event of a possible job loss, the information from the Robert Koch Institute could perhaps be helpful in court:

    The Robert Koch Institute in Germany announced the following:

    August 15, 2021

    “Covid-19 vaccines protect against Sars Cov-2 virus infections”.

    September 07, 2021

    “Covid-19 vaccines protect against severe course of infection with Sars Cov-2 virus”.

    September 27, 2021

    “Covid-19 vaccines are indicated for active immunization prevention of covid-19 disease caused by Sars Cov-2 virus.”

    Now that it is becoming increasingly clear that the PfizerBiontech/Moderna vaccines and all the others do not protect against contagion, nor do they protect against disease, and certainly do not protect against death, it is safe to assume that the warfare agent used by China (against Trump), has not been brought under control until now.

    In other words, the purpose of approval supersedes the effect here. The vaccines that still protected against “infections with the SARS-CoV-2 virus” on August 15, 2021, that no longer protected against infection on September 7, 2021, but at least still protected against a severe course of infection, are now only approved for this protection, are only used for this protective purpose, a protective purpose that they obviously no longer meet.
    This is a declaration of bankruptcy and an obvious admission of the fact that it is not divine manna that is injected into upper arms, but earthly junk, junk with the corresponding side effects.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Sorry Jack! But employers have the full force of the government backing them up as well as local judges so no legal cases are getting through no matter what strategy is being used.

    Sandra “Sandy” Espinoza Holt

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Liked by 1 person

    • Actually, I know of 3 (Alabama, South Carolina, & Indiana) cases that judges sided with the employees. There are probably more. I think it depends on your local. San Antonio would likely be an unfavorable judge.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s