Trump Team attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, both renown federal prosecutors, have provided startling previews of some of the evidence gathered from the investigation into the 2020 election fraud.
From Giuliani, we know sworn affidavits are in hand and early lawsuits have been filed to garner precedent in courts. He’s admitted some of their findings will be revealed in litigation.
Powell’s words have not been subtle. Last week during a televised Lou Dobbs appearance on Fox Business, she stated she is going to “release the Kraken” and blow the fraud in the election wide open.
She said they have “staggering” statistical evidence and testimony to show Dominion voting machines altered ballots, and this deception stems back to Venezuela, Cuba, and China.
On a Sunday morning interview with Fox Business News’ Maria Bartiromo, Powell continued her determination.
“We’re fixin’ to overturn the results of the election in multiple states, and President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose,” she revealed.
“We have sworn witness testimony of why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections. He was fully briefed on it. He saw it happen in other countries. It was exported internationally for profit by the people that are behind Smartmatic and Dominion.”
“They did this on purpose,” Powell continued. “It was calculated and they’ve done it before. We have evidence from 2016 in California. We have so much evidence I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.”
Powell was particularly hard on CIA Director Gina Haspel, indicating the agency’s intelligence ignored multiple calls to investigate voter integrity surrounding the electronic voting systems. Powell said Haspel should be immediately fired for her incompetence.
Powell mentioned to Dobbs and Bartiromo that their legal team are collecting evidence about high level political family members who collected kickbacks from people who accepted Dominion software that was used in 30 states to tabulate American votes.
“Their own manual, if you sat down and read it, would explain, how and why, no honest person would use their system,” Powell said.
Dominion and other voting systems have been used by Deep State controlled operatives to circumvent the security of U.S. elections. “They can stick a thumb drive in the machine or upload software to it, even from the internet. They can do it from Germany or Venezuela, even. They can remote access anything, they can watch votes in real-time, they can shift votes in real-time.”
Powell said they have “identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used and planned to use from the beginning, in this case, to modify the vote to make sure Biden won.”
Powell reminded Americans that Joe Biden, who in his “demented state,” was truthful when he stated before television cameras that he had the “largest voter fraud organization ever.”
“Well, it’s massive voter fraud and it’s going to undo the entire election,” Powell charged.
“They can do anything they want with the votes,” she revealed. “They can have the machines not read the signature. They can have the machines not read the down-ballot. They can make the machine read and catalog only the Biden votes. It’s like drag and drop whatever you want, wherever you want—upload votes.”
“In fact, we’ve got math in Michigan and Pennsylvania, I think it is, where all of a sudden hundreds of thousands of votes at 67% ratio for Biden and 37% for Trump were uploaded multiple times into the system.”
According to both MSNBC, and reported by Forbes, in 2012 the Republican National Committee sent a letter to election officials in six states, “raising concerns that machines had wrongly counted votes for Romney as ones for Obama, and asking them to address the problem.”
On November 6, 2012 Forbes released a video of a voting machine in New York actually changing votes. They posted this account from a software developer who noticed the fraud:
There were 4 older ladies running the show and 3 voting booths that are similar to a science fair project in how they fold up. They had an oval VOTE logo on top center and a cartridge slot on the left that the volunteers used to start your ballot.
I initially selected Obama but Romney was highlighted. I assumed it was being picky so I deselected Romney and tried Obama again, this time more carefully, and still got Romney. Being a software developer, I immediately went into troubleshoot mode. I first thought the calibration was off and tried selecting Jill Stein to actually highlight Obama. Nope. Jill Stein was selected just fine. Next, I deselected her and started at the top of Romney’s name and started tapping very closely together to find the ‘active areas’. From the top of Romney’s button down to the bottom of the black checkbox beside Obama’s name was all active for Romney. From the bottom of that same checkbox to the bottom of the Obama button (basically a small white sliver) is what let me choose Obama. Stein’s button was fine. All other buttons worked fine.
I asked the voters on either side of me if they had any problems and they reported they did not. I then called over a volunteer to have a look at it. She him hawed for a bit then calmly said “It’s nothing to worry about, everything will be OK.” and went back to what she was doing. I then recorded this video.
There is a lot of speculation that the footage is edited. I’m not a video guy, but if it’s possible to prove whether a video has been altered or not, I will GLADLY provide the raw footage to anyone who is willing to do so. The jumping frames are a result of the shitty camera app on my Android phone, nothing more.
Also on November 6, 2012 The Christian Science Monitor posted an article “US judge allows Ohio voting software, alleged to be vulnerable to fraud.”
The concerns centered on voting software used in almost a third of Ohio’s counties. Their was serious concern of a digital ‘back door’ being used to exploit and alter vote totals.
“…new election software installed recently in county computers to format vote totals and transmit them to the Secretary of State’s Office” was testified by an expert witness to have this digital “back door.”
“The suit alleged that the Secretary of State’s Office used a legal loophole to install software on electronic voting systems in county vote-tabulation machines without having it checked by the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners, the state’s technical board that is charged with reviewing.”