The Least You Need to Know: Election Fraud Update Dec. 16, 2020

  • The election is not over: Biden has not been elected. There is no “president-elect” currently.

  • Biden made another false claim election was “free and fair,” even knowing it was rigged and fraudulent.
  • 92% of Republicans now believe the Election was rigged.

  • Bill Barr is leaving Dec. 23, 2020 from his position as Attorney General over the DOJ. Deputy AG Jeff Rosen will be acting AG. Look for John Durham to begin announcing indictments in the Russian Collusion Scandal soon (likely after Barr is gone).
  • Newt Gingrich was named to the Defense Policy Board which advises the Department of Defense and Secretary Chris Miller.
  • Alternate electors chosen by seven states, providing two parallel sets of electors to be considered by Congress on January 6th. This is a good strategic move for President Trump.
  • It’s important that the Trump Campaign convince America before Jan. 6, 2021 that the election was stolen. This can cause those pro-Trump electors to be chosen.
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled the state did NOT have the authority to abandon Voter ID rules because of the China Virus.
  • Many more lawsuits are under way in swing states and pending before SCOTUS. Despite the big deal mainstream media has been making about suits being rejected, Trump Campaign lawyers expected and hoped it would happen so they get to the Supreme Court faster.
  • Trump tweets: “What a fool Governor @BrianKempGA of Georgia is. Could have been so easy, but now we have to do it the hard way.”

  • President Trump is considering going over to Parler in wake of Twitter’s plan to censor him.
  • Time is running short for President Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and seize ballots as evidence of fraud.

  • Trump could also activate his 2018 Executive Order #13848 on foreign interference in US elections. If this happens, it will likely be near January 6th.

  • Xi Jinping told his elite Chinese troops to “prepare for war.”

Just Say The Word President Trump and Millions of Patriots Will Move Into Action

An Open Letter to Our President

Dear President Donald J. Trump,

For millions of patriotic Americans, the decision of the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit being rejected by the Supreme Court Friday was more than a slap in the face.

It was the last blow.

These citizens have watched as 2020 confirmed everything they have known about the progressive left far too long. Decent, hardworking and patriotic Americans have been taken advantage of.

They are not going to take it any more from Democrats, Republicans, Deep State operatives, George Soros, foreign countries such as China, or the extremely compromised media establishments (news and social).

The cheating, lying, and corruption has maxed out. Enough is enough. The jig is up.

In 2020, we showed up in historical highs–by the tens of thousands–to President Donald Trump’s rallys while Joe Biden’s operatives planned their election steal as he hid in a basement.

In November, we voted legally and according to law in record numbers. More evidence (a word mainsjtream media seems to have lost the meaning of) continues to surface that Trump’s landslide could have been from over 80 million honest votes.

We learned the Swamp illegally stole millions of our votes with the help of China and Soros. There is far more solid proof than any false nonsense that was cooked up for Spygate, the Russian Hoax, the Kavanaugh Confirmation, and the Witchhunt Impeachment we endured. And this was prior to the summer of the China Virus, not to mention the Antifa/BLM destruction, forcing our families into nursing homes to die, and controlling our movements.

The media and D.C. swamp may have worn many of us down, but they have underestimated us as least as much as the Japanese did at Pearl Harbor.

The “Sleeping Giant,” Silent Majority is awake.

The media institutions of Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS,  New York Times, Washington Post, Time Magazine and others are now as  irrelevant as Joe Biden is to Trojan Horse Kamala Harris.

Social media giants, currently protect the deception and corruption. We are not the vulnerable fools they make us out to be and this is their biggest mistake.

Already, we are finding ways to render them unnecessary and unimportant. We are creating alternatives and ways to replace them.

Many conservatives, in general and by nature, tend to be polite, quiet and abide by the rules…but only if they are fair and just.

No more will we told we can’t worship God while criminals are allowed to destroy our businesses.

While the Marxist plans were implemented, patriots focused on our values, talked it out over and over again, sought second, third, fourth and fifth opinions. We’ve slept on it.

Politicians, judges, election officials, reporters and editors had their chance to do what is morally and legally right. Patriotic America is not stuck sitting on the fence or the sidelines anymore.

We are now trusting our gut…and our faith.

China and the George Soros anti-American operatives who share their visions will be stopped.  Just as Americans did with the Japanese in the Pacific and Nazis in Europe, we will finish the fight they have forced upon us.

We will not take no for an answer from Supreme Court justices who bury their heads in the sand.

We are not listening to politicians from either party who have made their fortunes from China deals, Big Tech-Big Pharma money or any other nefarious influencers.

Patriotic Americans are waiting on the word from President Trump. Whether he wants to continue with the lawsuits and courts, we will support him.

If Trump decides to put Executive Order #13848 into play, we will back him up.

When conditions are such that the National Guard or Special Forces are called in to enforce the Constitution, by the millions, we will be there to defend our freedoms and values if required.

We didn’t asked to be cheated and controlled away from our rights and livelihoods, but we will damn sure protect them. 

In conclusion, we’ve heard President Trump many times say “God Bless America” and “In God We Trust.”

With this in the forefront of our minds and in our hearts, no matter which translation is used, we refer to our Bibles and specifically:

James 4:17

What Actions Can President Trump Take With the Executive Order Regarding the Election Crisis?

It’s beginning to appear as if patriotic Americans–at least 75 million of them–will be forced to take matters into their own hands if the Supreme Court justices will not do their job.

As citizens hear about the rejection of the Supreme Court to accept the Texas lawsuit on the election, Americans are angry and trying to make sense of it. Here are just a few responses:

“Where is the Constitution?”

“Why are Marxist Democrats exempt from our laws but only enforced on conservative citizens?”

“I’m fed up and ready to take it to the streets of it’s war against Americans they want. We’ve been more than patient waiting on laws to be enforced and enemies of the United States to be arrested. No more!”

“What is our recourse? This is dangerous not to abide by the Constitution. My comrades and I gave an oath to defend our country against enemies foreign and domestic. We’re ready. We are not about to let them ruin our country. Enough is enough.”

A wise outlook is to realize the Texas lawsuit was not the be all end all in this crisis. There are more lawsuits in the works. There is more than one solution.

Even before the 2020 Election, word was getting out about President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order #13848, signed on September 12, 2018.

From day one of his presidency, President Trump was provided with intelligence and knowledge regarding nefarious activities within the Deep State and foreign entities.

The writing was on the wall as evidenced by the Russian Hoax, Spygate, Mueller Investigation, a propagandized news and social media and a tainted impeachment.

The White House and U.S. Military have been strategically preparing for such events for a while. There are still several strong actions available. Perhaps the Executive Order #13848 will be necessary.

After studying it for a while, the EO seems to be a brilliant solution. Following is the order in it’s entirety. The least you need to know to understand it has been highlighted for your convenience.

Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):

(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and

(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.

The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.

(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.

(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.

(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.

Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and

(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:

(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;

(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;

(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;

(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;

(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;

(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;

(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;

(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or

(ix) any other measures authorized by law.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;

(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;

(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;

(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;

(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;

(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and

(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence Start Printed Page 46847in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

  THE WHITE HOUSE, September 12, 2018. Filed 9-13-18; 11:15 am]

[FR Doc. 2018-20203

Texas Files Lawsuit With Supreme Court Against 4 States in Violation of Election Laws

The Eyes of Texas have been watching the election fraud scandal beyond her own borders and does not like what she sees.

State Attorney General Ken Paxton today announced officials in the Lone Star State filed suit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court against specific swing states, alleging their election results are corrupted due to unlawful pre-election changes and therefore should be invalidated.

The suit alleges that Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all violated the Constitution’s elector’s clauses because each one made changes to voting procedures and rules via state courts or executive actions, not through their legislatures, as legally required.

In addition, Texas officials argue that differences existed in rules and procedures for voting in different counties within the same states, which is a violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection guarantee.

“Elections for federal office must comport with federal constitutional standards,” Paxton wrote in a statement. “For presidential elections, each state must appoint its electors to the electoral college in a manner that complies with the Constitution. The Electors Clause requirement that only state legislatures may set the rules governing the appointment of electors and elections and cannot be delegated to local officials. The majority of the rushed decisions, made by local officials, were not approved by the state legislatures, thereby circumventing the Constitution.”

Also, the Lone Star State argued that because of the executive-level and court-ordered changes made in the other states, “voting irregularities” occurred which tainted the outcome.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott with President Trump

Each of those states political machines allegedly went for Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order states to allow their legislatures — all of which are controlled by Republicans — to appoint their electors, as per Article II of the Constitution.

“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting,” the suit says. “The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.”

“Whether well-intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States,” the suit continues. “Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislature. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

Texas officials filed their case directly with the Supreme Court because under Article III it is the court of first impressions when it has original jurisdiction, including disputes between states.

“This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?” the suit asks.

“These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution,” the suit contends.

“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution,” it continued.

Roscoe B. Davis, a retired law enforcement officer, noted on Twitter that the Texas case is not about proving or disproving election fraud.

“All these Governors and Sec of States making these changes out in the open make the case pretty clear,” he added. “The Defense is going to claim it was a COVID Pandemic, mark my words, it’s all they got, it was their excuse for everything in every state.”

But, he notes further, “Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 is really clear and there is no Pandemic clause.”

“The relief being sought has not only precedent (Election of 1836) it has constitutional verbiage [sic] to back it up. Not asking for the SCOTUS to throw out ballots, just follow the Constitution and the 12th Amendment of a Contingent Election,” Davis wrote.

Will Dec.-Feb. Be Among Most Treacherous and Dangerous on US Soil?

While everyone is focused on President Donald J.Trump’s legal teams progress, including Sidney Powell’s Kraken release, it is wise to pay very close attention to our military.


Because December 2020 and January 2021 could likely bring some of the most treacherous and dangerous events in our history. You should plan for your loved ones protection and, especially if you live in a Democratic controlled city (where police departments have been ostracized and defunded), their survival.

Worse case scenarios could be civil war type actions, with losses of power and communication.

Too many reliable sources are warning “be ready for total internet and news manipulation, or no communication at all,” “do not trust mainstream media,” and “how will you keep warm in winter if utilities and energy is not available?”

“Trump knows violence has been planned for the election aftermath for a long time,” said one source. “He has nothing to lose by combating them in the courts, public opinion and if necessary, militarily. Media will be in full force saying he’s trying to take over, he’s bad for America, he’s against the Constitution–but it will be lies, and thank God, most people know that by now that it’s just the opposite of what they report.”

“Think about it. If he loses they’ll be coming after his family, his businesses, just everything. His back is to the wall. Hell, all of us are against the wall, but we’ve had enough.”

These are actual quotes: “Trump is bringing troops back to the states for a reason,” “special forces will now be like a separate arm of the military, answering more directly to him” and “he removed Esper and others to protect citizens from China and (George) Soros influence.”

My sources have never let me down. I’m trusting their knowledge and advice for my family.

Realize that Trump’s former Security Advisor General Mike Flynn is knowledgeable, smart and free. The President trusts him.

Cohen-Watnick, Flynn and Trump.

Know that Ezra Cohen-Watnick, a former aide to Flynn, is now the assistant secretary of defense for special operations. He was senior director of intelligence for the National Security Council and has close communication ties with House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes. Don’t take this phenomenal move lightly. This man now reports directly to…

…Defense Secretary Christopher Miller who Trump put in that position after terminating Mark Esper the week before.

“This reform will immediately improve agility to the department and the command and will enable us to streamline the information flow, enhance decision-making and more adaptively and adeptly support our commanders and their superb soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines,” Miller said last week.

The move aligns the Pentagon with the congressional 2017 National Defense Authorization Act. Congress  ordered the Pentagon to raise the assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low intensity conflict to a service secretary-like job and report directly to the defense secretary “for issues impacting the readiness and organization of special operations forces, special operations-peculiar resources and equipment, and civilian personnel management.”

Esper appeared to have been stalling. President Trump made it happen a week after Esper was out.

“Miller is a longtime veteran of the special operations community who retired from the Army in 2014 as a colonel,” Stars and Stripes reported last week. “Miller, who was a Green Beret, spent much of his career in the Army’s 5th Special Forces Group, commanding a company and a battalion. He fought in Afghanistan and Iraq as a Green Beret, participating in the initial invasions of both of those countries in 2001 and 2003, respectively.”

“The policy change comes one day after Miller announce the first major shift for the military under his watch — the hastened withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.”

Do not dismiss the fact that the Chairman of the Board for the Dominion ballot tabulation machines used to illegally manipulate votes in swing states, is Peter Neffenger. Remember his name. He is on the Biden Transition Team advising for national security. He was Barack Obama’s National Security Advisor.  a retired vice admiral of the U.S. Coast Guard.

Meanwhile over half of all Americans, realizing Trump won the election by a landslide of legal votes, are restless and fed up.

Their anger is pointed at:

1. The Democratic Mob, who planned and put into place treasonous actions to undermine and steal the 2020 election.

2. Mainstream Media, who have lied, distorted and hid coverage to manipulate the election. They have supported riots, destruction, and anti-American propaganda. How’s Fox News doing lately?

3. The lack of Republican leadership support for President Trump and protecting the integrity of citizens’ legal votes and election honesty. We are beginning to learn exactly who has been participating in the fraud gravy train. Why aren’t Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp or Texas Senator John Cornyn saying or doing ANYTHING to SUPPORT our President?

4. The arrogant dismissal of China, Ukraine, Cuba, Venezuela and other foreign interference permeating our politics, laws, health and economy.

We are also taking note of who is supporting President Trump, patriotic Americans and the Constitution. Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Jim Jordan, and Mike Johnson are among those who have been vocal and forthright in their actions for their constituents.

House Oversight Committee Ranking Members James Comer, R-Ky., Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga., and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Tex sent a letter to Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, claiming her “silence” on the issue of liberal thugs beating innocent Trump marchers in their rally earlier this month is part of a “broader pattern of viewpoint discrimination.”

“We respectfully request a hearing on the violence directed at supporters of President Trump on November 14, 2020,” they wrote to Maloney. “These supporters were exercising their First Amendment right to peacefully assemble within the District of Columbia.”

“The failure of the city’s leaders to afford basic protections to persons who may hold different political viewpoints from their own appears to be another concerning example of viewpoint discrimination in the District.”

“Despite the violence, the mainstream media and liberal establishment were quick to minimize the seriousness of the use of violence against Trump supporters by deriding them for failing to wear masks in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, and asserting that they were infiltrated by ‘white nationalists, conspiracy theorists, and far right activists,’” they wrote.

“City leaders have remained silent on the violence,” they continued. “This growing level of violence directed at others for holding different views is simply unacceptable.”

‘Hunter Biden Type Deals’ Used to Place Cheating Voting Systems in Swing States

The contrast is amazing.

Today over one million American patriots for President Donald Trump are singing the national anthem in the streets of Washington D.C.

Marching to Supreme Court.

They are showing the world what a peaceful protest actually is. There has been no looting, destruction, arson or attacks.

What this reveals is a decision each citizen has to make individually.  But it looks like the courts will soon determine the future of our constitution, freedoms and country.

Overwhelming evidence is coming forth to prove Deep State operatives, Democrat politicians and China have worked for four years to topple Donald J. Trump’s presidency.

Consistently failing, the ramifications of their attempt to steal the 2020 Election is showing illegal activities far more sinister than millions of Americans could have ever imagined.

The following is a succinct recap of what is developing.

Deep State criminals tweaked voting machine software to switch Trump votes to Biden to create the illusion of a Democrat victory.

A forensic analysis of engineers and software experts, in just one Michigan examination, revealed tens of thousands–perhaps millions–of votes were switched from Trump to Biden late into election night.

These same voting machines and their software were used through all the swing states.

Attorney Sidney Powell will be exposing “Hunter Biden type deals” used to pay Democratic Governors, Attorney Generals, politicians, election officials and their family members in exchange for using these computer and software systems.

George Soros and China are involved.

This system originated to steal elections in Venezuela, Cuba and other countries. It may have been used to secure Barack Obama’s second term.

In 2020, the Democratic shell game of cheating went into overdrive, because:

1.) they underestimated the amount of manufactured and “switched” votes needed in the 2016 election.

2.) their internal polling indicated Trump was winning 2020 by a landslide. He actually did.

3.) “More hands needed to be greased” to spread the ballot manipulation.

The United States may be headed for a constitutional crisis if this massive fraud is accepted by the courts.

The Michigan voting analysis of just the four largest counties was disturbing. It revealed startling patterns that proved an inserted algorithm switched votes from the Trump tally to the Biden column.

The greater the voting support for Trump and Republicans, the more votes were switched to Biden.

A key part of the Democratic cheat plan was to target the strongest Republican precincts where they knew Trump would win. The voting patterns revealed the cheating. Slices of Trump votes were stacked and distributed into Biden’s deck through the software manipulation.

The fraud was easy to implement because, astoundingly, the voting machine software, since 2001, has included a “weighted race” feature.

For this feature to be in the package, financial “incentives” were provided to election decision makers–possibly on both sides of the aisle in some states.
This “weighted race” feature allows votes to be skewed to one candidate or another, depending on the software settings.

The courts will soon have to decide the legalities of these machines because they take images of each vote. These images generates the vote tally.

Since the election, and contrary to federal law, Michigan officials have been busy deleting the images. 

This prevents any meaningful audit, other than using the paper votes which is barely practicable.

This is why the forensic examinations will be critical to prove statistical impossibilites and fraud.

A good way to identify who is cheating (Democrats and Republicans) is by seeing who will be fighting against LEGAL voting counts and forensic examinations.

The analysis so far have shown algorithm’s and vote switching impact on the vote tallys as screaming “fraud from the rooftops.”

“Where a precinct is heavily Democrat, the conspirators didn’t bother to switch Trump votes so the trend starts at flat,” one expert said. “As precincts on the chart are mapped progressively more Republican, the trend abruptly goes on its downward slope, with Republican voters seeming to increasingly favor Party over Trump. That’s thanks to the secret switching.”

For years Americans have experienced repeated voter fraud warnings that have been ignored or suppressed. We are beginning to understand the magnitude and why this is occurring.

It has taken the presidency of Donald Trump, the corruption of the owned media and the 2020 election to take us through this likely constitutional crisis to show how daring these “enemies of the people” have become.

Don’t Miss These Must See Articles

Pelosi Connection to Voter Fraud Software

The Secret Deep State Revealed

Kamala’s Shocking China Connection

Public School Principal Made 3rd Grader Take ‘Jesus Loves Me’ Mask Off is Federal Court Bound

Did a principal at Simpson Central Elementary School in Mississippi make a mistake when he told a student she needed to take off her COVID-19 mask?

A federal court will decide.

Alliance Defending Freedom

“The third-grade student, Lydia Booth, wished to peacefully share her Christian views with her schoolmates but, even though she wore the mask without disruption or incident on Oct. 13, the principal at her school in Pinola required her to remove and replace it,” according to the Alliance Defending Freedom.  

Two days later, school district administrators announced a policy that prohibits messages on masks that are “political, religious, sexual or inappropriate symbols, gestures or statements that may be offensive, disruptive or deemed distractive to the school environment.”

“Public schools have a duty to respect the free expression of students that the First Amendment guarantees to them,” said ADF Legal Counsel Michael Ross. “While school administrators face challenges in helping students navigate school life during a pandemic, those officials simply can’t suspend the First Amendment or arbitrarily pick and choose the messages that students can or can’t express.”

“Other students within the school district have freely worn masks with the logos of local sports teams or even the words ‘Black Lives Matter.’ This student deserves an equal opportunity to peacefully express her beliefs.”

According to the lawsuit, the girl’s mother, Jennifer Booth, communicated repeatedly with school officials before going to court.

Mrs. Booth pointed out to them that the school handbook had no policy limiting her daughter’s religious expression, “and that it, in fact, protects her speech under adopted policies that are consistent with the Mississippi Student Religious Freedom Act and the First Amendment.

A school official responded with a copy of the school’s plan addressing the district’s response to COVID-19, but the official’s response included retroactive modifications, including a ban on religious messages on face masks, that were not published in the original plan.

The following day, the district’s superintendent announced this new ban to all parents in the district.

“No public school student should be singled out for peacefully sharing her religious beliefs with fellow students,” said ADF Senior Counsel Tyson Langhofer, director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom. “Today’s students will be tomorrow’s legislators, judges, educators, and voters. That’s why it’s so important that public schools demonstrate the First Amendment values they are supposed to be teaching to students.”

The lawsuit asked the court to halt officials from enforcing their policy.

“Booth desires to wear her ‘Jesus Loves Me’ mask to school but is self-censoring her expression because her school has already enforced the policy and promises to continue to enforce it, which could subject her to escalating discipline, up to and including suspension.”

Sharkey Burke, one of more than 3,400 attorneys allied with ADF, is serving as local counsel in the lawsuit, L.B. v. Simpson County School District, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Answers Were Brilliant

The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote Thursday on whether to advance Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination to the full Senate.

Judge Barrett’s answers to questions from Senators last week demonstrate her extensive knowledge of the law and our Constitution.

A few exchanges in particular reveal why she would be an important addition to the Supreme Court:

  • Americans deserve an independent Court: “I believe Americans of all backgrounds deserve an independent Supreme Court that interprets our Constitution and laws as they are written,” she said.

  • “If we are to protect our institutions, and protect the freedoms, and protect the rule of law that’s the basis for the society and the freedom that we all enjoy—if we want that for our children and our children’s children—then we need to participate in that work.”

  • Judges shouldn’t be pundits: During last week’s hearings, Senate Democrats tried to force Judge Barrett to share her personal political opinions.

  • “I don’t think we want judges to be legal pundits. I think we want judges to approach cases thoughtfully, with an open mind,” she said.

  • Decisions must be based in law: “When I write an opinion resolving a case, I read every word from the perspective of the losing party. I ask myself how I would view the decision if one of my children was the party that I was ruling against,” Judge Barrett said. “Even though I would not like the result, would I understand that the decision was fairly reasoned and grounded in law?”

  • People of faith can serve: Democrats and leftwing pundits suggest that Judge Barrett can’t be impartial because of her deeply held Catholic faith. Sen. Lindsay Graham asked Barrett if she would be able to set aside any personal beliefs in deciding the cases that come before her.

  • “I can. I have done that in my time on the Seventh Circuit,” she said. “If I stay on the Seventh Circuit, I’ll continue to do that. If I’m confirmed to the Supreme Court, I will do that still.”

Like this article? Click “NOTIFY ME…” below for email notification when we post a new one. Thank you.

Updates on COVID-19 Orders for Masks, Schools

Mask violations

  • Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont (D) signed an executive order imposing a fine of up to $100 for violating the state’s mask mandate. The order took effect at midnight on Sept. 17. Connecticut has required individuals to wear masks in public places since April 17.
  • Thirty-four states have orders requiring individuals to wear masks in indoor or outdoor public spaces. All 24 states with a Democratic governor have statewide mask orders, while 10 out of 26 Republican states require face coverings.

No ‘New Normal’ in Constitution

Judge William Stickman IV of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania struck down some of Gov. Tom Wolf’s (D) COVID-19 orders. The suit was brought on behalf of various Pennsylvania counties, businesses, and elected officials.

It challenged, Wolf’s restrictions on indoor and outdoor gatherings, the continued closure of “non-life-sustaining” businesses, and prolonged stay-at-home orders.

Writing that the “liberties protected by the Constitution are not fair-weather freedoms,” Stickman, an appointee of President Donald Trump (R), ruled that the “Constitution cannot accept the concept of a ‘new normal’ where the basic liberties of the people can be subordinated to open-ended emergency mitigation measures.” 


  • In March and April, 48 states canceled in-person instruction for the remainder of the 2019-2020 academic year. Those states accounted for 99.4% of the nation’s 50.6 million public school students. Montana and Wyoming did not require cancellation of in-person instruction for the year. Montana schools were allowed to reopen on May 7 and Wyoming schools were allowed to reopen on May 15.
  • The current status of school reopenings is as follows: Washington, D.C., has a district-ordered school closure, five states have a state-ordered regional school closure, two states are open for hybrid or remote instruction only, four states have state-ordered in-person instruction, and 39 states have reopenings that vary by school or district.

Will Trump Be The Last True American President? -The Introduction

Fear is at the core of liberalism, and love, with trust, is at the core of conservatism. Liberalism is about control. Conservatism is about self-empowerment.

Hillary Clinton’s mentor and Barack Obama’s hero, Saul Alinsky wrote a book, the origins of today’s Democratic playbook, in which he said:

“The very first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

The Silent Majority cannot be silent anymore. Patriotic Americans not only have inalienable rights, we have the solemn duty to protect those rights.

Our natural rights and freedoms are guaranteed and recognized by the American Constitution, and the government cannot violate them under any circumstances. 

Every able American is required to
perform certain actions in order for others to enjoy more freedoms. 

Bikers For Trump

Our Rights Were Given To Us By God

In his own words Alinsky wrote, “The very first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

These natural rights are part of what it means to be a person. They were given to us by God. They can’t be denied or violated, but only under carefully limited circumstances according to our Constitution. 

When our Founders wrote in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal,” they were not ignoring the obvious differences that make people individuals—differences in appearance, personality, aptitude, skills, and character.

All humans are equal in the sense that we are born with certain inherent, natural, and unalienable rights. Those rights include “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

This essential equality means that no one–not George Soros, not Bill Gates, not Barack Obama, not Nancy Pelosi, not Joe Biden, or even Donald J. Trump–is born with a natural right to rule over us without our consent, and that our government is obligated to apply the law equally to everyone.

Voter integrity is vital. The rightful President should be that individual elected legally by Constitutional law. The Electoral College is our legal process.

Fear Not, We’re Americans

We must rid ourselves of the fear mindset that threatening powers want us to have. We must withstand this onslaught of evil and rally to the origin of our true national spirit.

We must rally to a standard of Americanism and solidly accept that condoning destruction, looting and evil is not that.

In essence, we must individually take a stand. Purposefully, deliberately and with forethought, we must engage those around us to get rid of this sense of fearful apprehension.

In order to protect the rights of our peaceful citizens, it’s sometimes necessary to infringe the rights of aggressors. The Founders understood that criminals who are a threat to the safety and property of others need to be prevented and stopped from exercising the right to move about where they please.

After a three month investigation, I have just completed the most alarming and terrifying report of my life.

Will Donald J. Trump be the last true President of the United States?

In June and July this summer, we traveled to 13 states and even Washington D.C. to meet, observe and dialogue with others about the current state of affairs. Even closer to home, I’ve listened to and dialogued with former and current government officials, military leaders and others about the secrets mainstream media will not tell us…and…the involvement in the planned takeover of America.

What we’ve learned is comprehensive, but startling. Beginning Saturday September 12, 2020 we will be posting an unforseen series that we hope you will read, follow and, most of all, share. As a preview, the following topics will be explored in five parts:

1. How the Democrats plan to oust President Trump from office even if he is reelected.

2. The actual “playbook” that will be used to successfully remove him from the White House.

3. The secret, behind-the-scenes government force set up by Democrats that are ready, in place, to take over.

4. Who and where these imbedded operatives  are.

5. Will Trump be the last true President?

For those of you sheltered in place at home with your mask on, if possible, relax a minute and forget about the “peaceful protests,” the NFL, Hollywood movies and propaganda from CNN and MSNBC.

Just beyond your front door is the real classic fight of good versus evil.

Church-goers are being fined for the crime of going to church. Church pastors are being arrested and threatened with arrest for the crime of delivering sermons.

Meanwhile Democrats conveniently allow “essential businesses” such as liquor stores, marijuana shops and casinos  to remain open.

There’s a specific reason Governors Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer and Mario Cuomo are aiding and abetting the cause.

Their playbook comes straight from Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky,  the communist minded organizer who dedicated his book to Lucifer.

As a primer to the five parts, or chapters to my series you’ll be reading and sharing with America the next few days, here are Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals:

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Three observations to keep in mind:

1. These governors, Democratic mayors and county district attorneys aren’t looking for unity. They are bought and paid to destroy anyone who doesn’t agree with the radical Marxist philosophy. Black Lives Matter leaders know how to cause chaos and to turn us against each other.

2. President Trump has become the ultimate chessplayer in the left’s game. His first term, a baptism by fire, has proved his prowess. He knows he can’t play their game. He is aware of their playbook and he has become a pro being anticipatory with them.

They’ve lost each game, from the Russian hoax to the impeachment attempt to the point they’re more than just mad. They’re insane…and like Lucifer…they’re evil.

3. America must not allow individuals,  corporations, or even sports teams to pander to any entity  that is working to tear our country apart.

You must share this information. You must boycott. You must support President Trump. You must vote.

Click “NOTIFY ME OF NEW POSTS BY EMAIL” to ensure you don’t miss a single article.

How Texas Could Impact the Future Supreme Court

A primary consideration to vote for a president in 2020 is because he will
“choose hundreds of federal judges, and, in all likelihood, one, two, three, and even four Supreme Court justices,” President Donald Trump said from the White House on September 10, 2020.

“Unfortunately, there is a growing radical-left movement that rejects the principle of equal treatment under law,” he remarked. “If this extreme movement is granted a majority on the Supreme Court, it will fundamentally transform America without a single vote of Congress.”

“Radical justices will erase the Second Amendment, silence political speech, and require taxpayers to fund extreme late-term abortion.”

“They will give unelected bureaucrats that power to destroy millions of American jobs.  They will remove the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.  They will unilaterally declare the death penalty unconstitutional, even for the most depraved mass murderers.” 

President Trump speaks about Supreme Court, September 10, 2020.

“They will erase national borders, cripple police departments, and grant new protections to anarchists, rioters, violent criminals, and terrorists.”

“In the recent past, many of our most treasured freedoms, including religious liberty, free speech, and the right to keep and bear arms, have been saved by a single vote on the United States Supreme Court.  Our cherished rights are at risk, including the right to life and our great Second Amendment.”

“The outcome of these decisions will determine whether we hold fast to our nation’s founding principles or whether they are lost forever.”

One of President Trump’s first actions when he took office in 2017 was to nominate Judge Neil Gorsuch. A year later Brett Kauvenaugh was nominated.

By the end of his first term, Trump will have confirmed a record number of federal judges — over 300, “all of whom will faithfully uphold our Constitution as written.”

Thursday, the President announced 20 additions to his list of qualified potential Supreme Court nominees.

Of those nominees, two are from Texas. This is important to note because the Lone Star State, at 38, has the most Electorial College votes of any state other than liberal California.

The six states with the most electors are California (55), Texas (38), New York (29), Florida (29), Illinois (20), and Pennsylvania (20).

The two potential nominees include:

Ted Cruz is a United States Senator for the State of Texas.  Prior to his election in 2012, Senator Cruz was a partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and served as Solicitor General of Texas.  Senator Cruz served as a law clerk to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist on the Supreme Court of the United States and Judge J. Michael Luttig on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.  Senator Cruz received his A.B., cum laude, from Princeton University and his J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School.

James Ho is a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  Prior to his appointment in 2018, Judge Ho was a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP and served as Solicitor General of Texas.  Judge Ho clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court of the United States and Judge Jerry Smith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  He received his B.A., with honors, from Stanford University and his J.D., with high honors, from the University of Chicago Law School.

Other interesting choices are Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Josh Hawley of Missouri, Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a prominent black Republican, and White House lawyer Kate Todd, as well as former solicitors general Paul Clement and Noel Francisco, and US ambassador to Mexico Christopher Landau and assistant attorney general Steven Engel.

Highly Anticipated ‘Trump Card’ Movie Out October 9, 2020

With many theaters still closed, Dinesh D’Souza’s most important film yet, Trump Card, will be available as video on demand and DVD on October 9 for every American to see!

Watch the official trailer and share with your friends:

Written and directed by acclaimed filmmaker, scholar, and New York Times bestselling author Dinesh D’Souza, Trump Card is an exposé of the socialism, corruption, and gangsterization that now define the Democratic Party.

Whether it is the creeping socialism of Joe Biden or the overt socialism of Bernie Sanders, the film reveals what is unique about modern socialism, who is behind it, why it’s evil, and how we can work together with President Trump to stop it.


The film reveals how the Left uses the Venezuelan formula for socialism, decisively refutes this new face of socialism, chillingly documents the full range of the Left’s gangster tendencies, and provocatively exposes the tactics of the socialist Left.

Today’s socialists claim to model themselves on the “socialism that works” in Scandinavian countries like Norway and Sweden. In reality, socialism abandoned the working class and found new recruits by drawing on the resentments of race, gender, and sexual orientation. Modern-day socialism is “identity socialism,” a marriage between classic socialism and identity politics.

In his books and films, he is famous for exposing Hillary Clinton for the corrupt liar she is, but also showing that she was just the latest in a long line of Democratic Party thugs trying to steal America’s wealth for themselves. Just as much about the secret history of the Democratic Party as Hillary Clinton’s corrupt candidacy, his film is more relevant now than ever as the Left pulls out its old playbook in an attempt to undermine President Trump.

D’Souza has had a prominent career as a writer, scholar, and public intellectual, and has also become a renowned filmmaker with his top-grossing documentaries 2016: Obama’s AmericaAmerica: Imagine the World Without Her, and Hillary’s America.

Born in Mumbai, India, D’Souza came to the U.S. as an exchange student and graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Dartmouth College in 1983.