Desperation of Corrupt Media Tactics Doesn’t Work on American Patriots

Although Some Democrats Can’t Comprehend

This 1960’s vintage car, projecting the appearance of the JFK assassination, didn’t intimidate the patriots standing in line at the Trump rally at Madison Square Garden Sunday

Accusing an opponent of being like Hitler, especially when facing declining poll numbers, can stem from several psychological reasons:

● Desperation and Fear:

The candidate may feel threatened by their opponent’s rising popularity. Accusing the opponent of extreme behavior can be a way to instill fear in voters, hoping to sway public perception.

● Projection: The accusing candidate might be projecting their own insecurities or authoritarian tendencies onto their opponent. This can serve to deflect criticism from their own shortcomings.

Media is desperate

● Rhetorical Strategy: Such extreme comparisons can be a deliberate strategy to generate media attention and rally a base. It can also provoke strong emotional reactions, which might energize supporters.

● Cognitive Dissonance: As the candidate’s situation worsens, they might experience cognitive dissonance, leading them to adopt more extreme positions to reconcile their failing campaign with their self-image as a strong leader.

Usual fake news projecting

● Manipulation of Historical Context: By evoking a figure like Hitler, the candidate can tap into deep-seated fears and negative associations, which can be a way to frame their opponent as a threat to democracy and values.

● Victim Mentality: The candidate may adopt a victim narrative, portraying themselves as a defender against a perceived authoritarian enemy, which can rally support from those who share similar fears.

Irrational headlines, fake reporting

● Loss of Rational Discourse: As a campaign falters, candidates may resort to increasingly irrational or hyperbolic statements, abandoning nuanced debate in favor of shock value.

These factors can create a potent mix of fear, strategy, and emotional appeal, particularly in a high-stakes political environment.

Media lies bite back

In this scenario— outcomes can vary widely, but some typical possibilities include:

● Short-Term Media Attention: The accusation may generate significant media coverage, temporarily boosting the candidate’s visibility and allowing them to dominate news cycles.

Polarization of Voter Base: Such statements can deepen divisions among voters. While some may rally around the accusing candidate, others may find the comparison offensive or hyperbolic, potentially alienating moderate voters.

Ku Klux Klan

● Backlash and Rejection: If the accusation is perceived as excessive or unfounded, it can backfire, leading to public outrage or a loss of credibility. Voters may seek more rational discourse and reject candidates who resort to extreme rhetoric.

Smith lost

● Erosion of Support: For undecided or moderate voters, extreme accusations can signal a lack of substantive policy discussion, causing them to shift their support to the opponent or another candidate.

Carter lost in 1980

● Reinforcement of Opposition Narrative: The accused candidate may use the assertion to frame themselves as a victim of unfounded attacks, possibly gaining sympathy and support from voters who value civility and reasoned debate.

Touchê

● Impact on Campaign Strategy: The candidate may feel pressured to double down on aggressive tactics, further alienating some voters and potentially leading to a downward spiral in their campaign.

JFK in 1960 at MSG

● Long-Term Reputation Damage: Engaging in extreme rhetoric can damage a candidate’s reputation, making it difficult for them to pivot to more constructive dialogue in the future.

● Potential for Legal or Ethical Consequences: Depending on the context, such accusations could lead to legal challenges or ethical scrutiny, especially if they cross into defamation or misinformation.

Ultimately, while such accusations can momentarily energize a campaign, they often carry risks that can negatively affect the candidate’s long-term viability and public perception.

☆☆☆☆☆

IN GOD WE TRUST

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack


Dodie & Jack Dennis are regular customers of Green Pasture. Highly recommended.


Green Pasture Here!

Use Code CLEVER10 for a 10% discount on other Green Pasture products today!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

GREENPASTURE.ORG

______________________

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

DANGER CLOSE

Byrne’s DANGER CLOSE is available here.

☆☆☆☆☆

New book by award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey out August 1, 2021.

See details here!

3 comments

  1. Looks like we posted on the same thing yesterday. I did mine during lunch and did not get nearly as many examples as you, but when I was about to publish — I noticed your post. Therefore, I gave you a hat tip. Hope that you caught the hat tip.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to markone1blog Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.