Another COVID-19 Vaccine Maker May Haved Used Wrong Data

It took less than a day after AstraZeneca touted its COVID-19 vaccine was 79 percent effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19, that the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) issued a statement indicating the drugmaker’s announcement may have been based on outdated data.

On March 22, AstraZeneca claimed their vaccine demonstrated 79 percent efficacy at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and 100 percent efficacy at preventing severe disease and hospitalization in its U.S. phase 3 trial. 

NIAID issued a statement just after midnight on March 23, saying its data and safety monitoring board expressed concern that AstraZeneca’s announcement was based on “outdated information from that trial, which may have provided an incomplete view of the efficacy data.”

AstraZeneca’s vaccine is authorized for emergency use in dozens of countries, but it has not yet been approved in the U.S. The drugmaker is expected to apply for FDA emergency approval within weeks. 

The data and safety monitoring board notified AstraZeneca and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority of its concerns. 

NIAID urged AstraZeneca to work with its data and safety monitoring board to review the efficacy data and ensure it quickly makes the most accurate and up-to-date efficacy data available. 

9 thoughts on “Another COVID-19 Vaccine Maker May Haved Used Wrong Data

  1. Wow! This really causes me not to trust any of the shots. It doesn’t matter who made them. I feel like this whole pandemic and everything I’ve witnessed in the past five years has taken everything I was taught about the goodness of the world and flipped it upside down. And it’s disappointing, to say the least.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. urge anyone with an open mind to NOT get any of these shots. You are participating in a stage 4 clinical trial pushed on us by a government who is not working together for the best interests of Americans in mind.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Well stated! ALL of these shots, regardless of manufacturer, are dangerous experiments being pushed on the unsuspecting public. The reason they didn’t do testing and safety trials on humans is because awhile back, they did testing of another SARS-CoV ‘vaccine’ on ferrets – found to have immune systems very similar to ours. After injecting them, then exposing them to the virus, ALL of the ferrets DIED!
    So these manufacturers rushed these shots out on an EUA/Emergency Use Authorization (NOT the same thing as an Approval by the FDA), claiming these injections would save thousands of people from dying of COVID infection. Yes – the same infection that has a 95-99.9% recovery rate! As a bonus, these shots DO NOT provide immunity to the Covid virus or prevent transmission from one person to another. Why do you think they’re (Fauci) telling us you should still wear a mask or 2 after being fully ‘vaccinated’? Have you seen the recent reports of the hundreds of people testing Positive for Covid at least 2 weeks after being ‘fully vaccinated’?? How much more proof do you need that these injections are NOT vaccines, but only serve to mitigate/lessen symptoms of a Covid infection?!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s