Many citizens have heard of USAID. Now, every American should immediately become aware of the Center for U.S. Global Leadership Committee (USGLC)!
This is their scheme and pattern:
● It’s a self-reinforcing loop.
● A company or entity receives federal funding, often through “soft power” channels like USAID.
● Once that money becomes part of its revenue stream, the company has a direct financial incentive to support the politicians controlling the purse strings.
● That’s the mechanism of how Bill Gates and George Soros accomplished ideological capture over the business world.
“Hillary Clinton is officially a member of the National Advisory Board of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition,” the organization announced in May 2013. “The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition is composed of around 400 NGOs and other businesses, as well as foreign policy experts. It is a broad, influential network. The “leaders” come from all 50 states of the country, and the primary goal is a smart power approach to increase diplomacy as well as development around the world.”
On the day it was announced Clinton was joining the Advisory Board, USGLC claimed that “there should be a larger International Affairs Budget, and that America could be doing much more in terms of diplomacy and development, through manpower and funding.”
Other members on the advisory council Clinton joined included “General Colin L. Powell, who is the Honorary Chairman, Madeleine Albright, Samuel R. Berger, Howard Berman, and Harold Brown.”
By December 2020 Dr. Anthony Fauci wormed his way onto the stage with Dr. Julie Gerberding, Chief Patient Officer & Executive Vice President, Merck; and Sally Susman, Executive Vice President & Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, Pfizer to receive his Lifetime Achievement Award from USGLC.
On December 1, 2022, former President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush received USGLC’s “Global Leadership Award.” At this point in time, the number of NGOs reached over 500.
Past USGLC tribute honorees included then-Vice President Joe Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Secretaries Bob Gates and Condoleezza Rice.
It’s a similar pattern with illegal aliens brought into the country, provided with substantial benefits and given the ID necessary to vote in most elections.
These politicians don’t care about the people they brought in. They just want voters who will blindly support them and keep them in office.
It is systems hacking.
Which politicians receive huge donations from both USGLC member companies and their employees?
Land ‘O Lakes
Let’s start with Land O’Lakes, which was a surprise recipient of $100 million in USAID money.
When a company takes federal money, it gives the government leverage over its decisions.
We don’t know who pushed Land O’Lakes to remove the Indian from its logo. But if a company gets $100 million in USAID funding, those kinds of changes start to seem suspicious.
The company’s donations are split and relatively small, but they do spend an increasing volume of money in lobbying. Michigan Democrat Senator Amy Klobuchar, a ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, is the top recipient of funds.
(It is little wonder Klobuchar included one stick of melted Land O Lakes butter in her recipe for the 2014 Minnesota Congressional Delegation Hotdish Competition.)
80% of their 2024 employee donations go to Democratic candidates.
● Democratic candidates: $24,250 (80.3%)
● Republican candidates: $1,385 (4.6%)
● Other — PACs & committees: $4,550 (15.1%)
Pfizer
60% of 2024 Pfizer donations went to Democratic candidates. But 90% of Presidential donations went to Kamala Harris.
● Kamala Harris (D): $352,021 (89.9%)
● Donald Trump (R): $39,743 (10.1%)
Disney
For Walt Disney Co., the numbers are similar. 63.4% of employee donations are to the Democratic party.
The company itself spends 5 million on lobbying annually. Donations started decoupling in the Democratic favor around 2008.
Although USGLC was founded in 1995, it only gained federal prominence in the 2008 cycle. Bill Gates gave USGLC its first big investment in 2007.
● Democratic candidates: $20,400 (63.4%)
● Republican candidates: $5,500 (17.1%)
● Other — PACs & committees: $6,300 (19.5%)
Coca-Cola & PepsiCo
One of the big surprises about USGLC was the representation of food and beverage companies (PepsiCo, Coca-Cola).
84.3% of Coca-Cola employee donations for a 2024 presidential candidate went towards Kamala Harris.
● Kamala Harris (D): $72,993 (84.3%)
● Donald Trump (R): $13,599 (15.7%)
75% of PepsiCo employee donations went to Kamala Harris.
● Kamala Harris (D): $108,462 (75.0%)
● Donald Trump (R): $36,246 (25.0%)
Both companies spent quite a bit on lobbying.
Citigroup
Citigroup (Citibank) employees and organization donated a stunning 92.9% to Kamala Harris rather than Donald Trump.
● Kamala Harris (D): $243,533 (92.9%)
● Donald Trump (R): $18,576 (7.1%)
Total: $262,109 (100%)
Walmart
Even Walmart, which has had traditionally Republican leadership, had more donations for Harris than Trump.
● Kamala Harris (D): $366,388 (57.9%)
● Donald Trump (R): $266,604 (42.1%)
Hogan Lovells
It is important to know that Norm Coleman, former Republican Senator from Minnesota is the co-chair of Center for U.S. Global Leadership Board.
He represents Hogan Lovells. Their employees donated a lot of money ($272,888) to Kamala Harris and not a single cent towards Donald Trump.
● Democratic recipients: $490,309 (83.6%)
● Republican recipients: $95,968 (16.4%)
Sesame Workshop
Sesame Workshop made over a million in contributions in 2024.
Zero – exactly zero – went to Republican candidates.
Sesame Street went from teaching ABCs to funding DEIs. It turns out the real puppets aren’t on screen—they’re in Washington.
Chemonics International
Employees of Chemonics International gave exactly 0% to Republican candidates in 2024.
● Democratic candidates: $40,606 (92.5%)
● Republican candidates: $0 (0%)
● Other — PACs & committees: $3,282 (7.5%)
Total: $43,888 (100%)
“In June 2020, Chemonics was added to the defendant’s list of a lawsuit that was previously filed in December 2019 against six other companies, including DAI, Louis Berger, among others, for allegedly paying bribes, or protection money, to the Taliban in a lawsuit brought by families of American victims. This claim relates to whether Chemonics may have violated the Anti-Terrorism Act which makes it illegal for any individual or entity to provide material support to terrorist groups like the Taliban. In 2024, a report by Center for Advanced Defense Studies said that Chemonics purchased products made in Xinjiang, potentially using forced Uyghur labor, including from sanctioned entity Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.” –en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemonics
☆☆☆☆
To receive free email notification when we post new articles like this, sign up below. Clever Journeys does & will not sell or share your information with anyone.
☆☆☆☆☆
IN GOD WE TRUST
Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack
Dodie & Jack Dennis are regular customers of Green Pasture. Highly recommended.
Green Pasture Here!
Use Code CLEVER10 for a 10% discount on other Green Pasture products today!
Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!
☆☆☆☆☆
See details here!
Clever Journeys 
Unbelievable, and yet, not surprising.
LikeLiked by 5 people
They present as so innocently noble, and are so horribly corrupt.
Wasn’t Coke one of the companies that fired people for not getting the vax? I know they are woke, but can’t remember for sure.
LikeLiked by 2 people
In October 2021, Coca-Cola implemented a nationwide policy that required employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. If employees were not fully vaccinated by Jan. 1, 2022, they could face discipline including suspension and termination.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, I thought so. Probably they hope we forget.
LikeLiked by 2 people