America’s history is graced with stories of brave men and women who did not back down from tyranny. Such is the case of a tenured professor at Standford University in 2020.

His story is a valuable lesson and microcosm of what was happening to United States citizens who disagreed with the government enforced pandemic responses.

In 2020, according to a scientific study he was part of, Bhattacharya revealed that the “lockdowns we were doing were not going to work. The disease had been spreading. But the death rate implied by our study was something like 0.2 percent, whereas the World Health Organization was telling people that the death rate was 3.5 percent.”

“I presented the results in a seminar in the medical school, and I was viciously attacked. Even though everyone thought that the decline in the number of cases was due to the lockdowns. If you look at other countries that didn’t lock down, however, they had a very similar epidemic curve. That result, I thought, was quite an important one, but it led to a number of hit pieces against me and my family.”

Bhattacharya acknowledged Stanford “said that appearance endangered public health, although now it’s widely acknowledged that contact tracing did basically nothing. It’s not okay for the University to tell a professor that they can or cannot speak. That’s just a straight-up violation of academic freedom.”

“I’m a health policy person. I do health policy for a living, and this was the most important health policy issue of my lifetime. How could I stop? How could I stay silent? A lot of junior professors reached out to me and said that they were glad I was speaking up, because they couldn’t, because they were afraid to lose their tenure.”

In the past months, we have visited numerous family and friends in hospitals or attended their funerals (representative of virtually all ages) and they had one thing in common: they took the Covid shots.

This week, I received a phone call from another dear one telling me the same thing. He is in the hospital and expressed the familar symptoms. I AM MAD AS HELL.

What happened to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya also occurred to parents at school board meetings, worshipers in churches, shoppers in grocery stores and diners in restaurants. This is what happens when one political party takes over all of the messaging. One of the good things to come out of all of this is that the dissenting voices have been vindicated. They were right.

Donald Trump’s selection of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) is great news for America.

When Trump intially made the announcement, shortly after winning the 2024 Election, he noted, that “For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health.”

“The Safety and Health of all Americans is the most important role of any Administration, and HHS will play a big role in helping ensure that everybody will be protected from harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides, pharmaceutical products, and food additives that have contributed to the overwhelming Health Crisis in this Country,” Trump said. “Mr. Kennedy will restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research, and beacons of Transparency, to end the Chronic Disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

Trump was right on to select Kennedy as the Secretary of the Department that oversees  the corrupt CDC, FDA, NIH, and others.

“Together we will clean up corruption, stop the revolving door between industry and government, and return our health agencies to their rich tradition of gold-standard, evidence-based science,” Kennedy responded to the announcement on X. “I will provide Americans with transparency and access to all the data so they can make informed choices for themselves and their families.”

Just last year, Kennedy said this about Fauci:

“I think that he particularly, by withholding early treatment from Americans, we racked up the highest death count in the world. We only have 4.2 percent of the globe’s population, but we had 16 percent of the COVID deaths in this country and that was from bad policy.”

One of the least honestly reported, but most important news regarding this is that RFK, Jr. and Senator Rand Paul have both expressed enthusiasm for Dr. Bhattacharya’s new role as National Institute of Health (NIH) Director in the Trump administration.

He came under fire during the pandemic after co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration, which was an open letter signed by thousands of doctors and scientists in 2020 denouncing lockdowns as harmful. Bhattacharya was joined by Harvard professor of medicine Dr. Martin Kulldorff and Oxford professor Dr. Sunetra Gupta in co-authoring the document.

Bhattacharya was not only denigrated by mainstream media, along with former public health officials, including former NIH Director Anthony Fauci, but was censored by social media companies under federal government pressure.

Bhattacharya courageously fought back, arguing that in many scientific circles during the pandemic, “power replaced the idea of truth as the guiding light.”

“So you have somebody like Tony Fauci who says unironically, that if you question me, you’re not simply questioning a man, you’re questioning science itself. That is an exercise of raw power, where he places himself effectively as the pope of science rather than a genuine desire to learn the truth.”

“An underlying issue here is academic freedom. Under both the Obama and Biden administrations, we saw the similar experiences happening to experts who challenge the assumptions of climate change, Genetically Modified Organisms in our food, and body sculpting individuals who believe they could change their sex.”

“If Stanford really truly were committed to academic freedom, they would have … worked to make sure that there were debates and discussions, seminars, where these ideas were discussed among faculty, regardless of whether academics agreed or disagreed….,” Bhattacharya noted at the time.

During his first term, President Trump was silenced–for the first time in American history–by a political party that spent at least seven years using the full force of the United States government to persecute a political opponent. This is what happens in China, Cuba, North Korea, and Venezuela.

The GMO Corn Dilemma

It is little wonder that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum plans to use their constitution to protect her country from America’s genetically modified corn.

 In 2024, GMO corn accounted for nearly 94 percent of the corn planted in the US, occupying over 86 million acres. American corn is so contaminated that Mexico, the second largest importer of US corn after China, has vowed to ban the use and cultivation of GM corn.

Not wanting to deal with the corrupt Biden-Harris administration, Mexico’s move to decrease dependence on GM corn imports and focus more on national food self-sufficiency has caused friction between the two countries.

Sheinbaum is seeking to work with Trump’s new team via the United  States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA).

The US produces around 367.1 million tons of corn a year compared to Mexico’s 27 million. 

The United States uses the most GM corn globally—forcing it in everything from livestock feed, biofuel production (ethanol), and as an ingredient in processed foods (think high-fructose corn syrup—only a few countries worldwide have permitted the cultivation of GM corn, and slightly more have allowed its import for human or animal consumption or industrial use).

“In Mexico, the introduction of GM corn has resulted in the transgenic contamination of native varieties, leading to adverse environmental, biocultural, social, economic, and political impacts,” reports Tracy Beanz, an investigative journalist who often appears on the Joe Pags Radio & Podcast Show.  “Numerous scientific studies have systematically documented these effects. Nonetheless, riddled with conflicts of interest, the United States relentlessly pushes its mission, putting profits over health.”

“Yet, importantly, independent scientific groups, free from conflicts of interest, have demonstrated that consuming GM corn poses serious health risks to laboratory and farm animals,” Beanz reports. “These include damage to the reproductive and digestive organs, heightened immunological and allergic responses, increased mortality rates, and the onset of chronic degenerative diseases such as cancer.”

“Additionally, GM corn is closely tied to the use of hazardous pesticides as part of its cultivation process,” she continued. “This exposes consumers—both human and animal—to harmful substances, particularly glyphosate. Even at low doses, glyphosate has been shown to cause carcinogenic effects, disrupt endocrine systems, impair reproductive health, and trigger various metabolic disorders, as well as damage multiple organs and bodily systems.”

What about Stanford’s censureship?

“A lot of professors feel bullied by a relatively small number of loud, powerful faculty members that push the sense that if you speak against what they think, you are somehow evil and should be excised from the University,” Bhattacharya said.

☆☆☆☆☆

IN GOD WE TRUST

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack

---

Dodie & Jack Dennis are regular customers of Green Pasture. Highly recommended.

---

Green Pasture Here!

Use Code CLEVER10 for a 10% discount on other Green Pasture products today!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

GREENPASTURE.ORG

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

☆☆☆☆☆

See details here!