Texans Jack & Dodie

Massive Evidence Shows Negative Health Issues From 5G Technology

Many children and adults are likely experiencing negative symptoms from 5G but don’t associate the symptoms with the technology.

“As long as radiation hazards are not acknowledged, they are not noticed,” warned Dr. Lennart Hardell, a world-leading scientist on cancer risks from radiation.

There is increasing evidence that the “microwave syndrome” or “electro-hypersensitivity” (EHS) is a real disease that is caused by exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), especially those in the microwave range.

Today, most countries, have adopted regulatory guidelines and EMF policies recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) that assume negative health effects only occur when the levels of RF radiation are high enough to heat human tissue.

Such guidelines — including those set by the Federal Communications Commission in the U.S. — don’t take into account long-term exposure to lower levels of radiation, like what’s used in 5G.

Many reports show incidence of the syndrome is increasing along with increasing exposure to EMFs from electricity, WiFi, mobile phones and towers, smart meters and many other wireless devices.

As far back as the 1970s to 1980s, US government reports provided evidence for many neuropsychiatric effects of non-thermal microwave EMFs, based on occupational exposure studies.

22 more recent epidemiological studies, provide substantial evidence that microwave EMFs (especially 5G technology) from cell/mobile phone base stations, excessive cell/mobile phone usage and from wireless smart meters can each produce similar patterns of neuropsychiatric effects. 

Among the more commonly reported changes are sleep disturbance/insomnia, headache, depression/depressive symptoms, fatigue/tiredness, dysesthesia, concentration/attention dysfunction, memory changes, dizziness, irritability, loss of appetite/body weight, restlessness/anxiety, nausea, skin burning/tingling/dermographism and EEG changes. 

Mona Nilsson, the managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, said it was a “great scandal” that “5G has been rolled out for several years now in Sweden and in the U.S. without any study at all being performed about the health effects.”

“These two studies show that 5G is very dangerous to health and that the scientists and doctors who have been warning for years of serious consequences for human health due to a predicted massive increase in microwave radiation … have been right in their assessments,” Nilsson added.

“A society forcing toxic exposure on innocent people, especially the most sensitive, cannot be accepted,” Hardell acknowledged. 

Nilsson agreed. “Children are taking part on a massive scale in a huge and dangerous experiment — without their or their parents informed consent — which may lead to serious long-term consequences.” 

☆☆☆☆

IN GOD WE TRUST

Thanks for supporting independent true journalism with a small tip. Dodie & Jack

Green Pasture Here!

Use Code CLEVER10 for a 10% discount on other Green Pasture products today!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

GREENPASTURE.ORG

☆☆☆☆☆

16 comments

  1. Well, Hell-bells. After reading the list of symptoms…that explains everything: I got them all. There is a 5 G tower not far from me, my phone is 5G, my wireless internet is 5G and now my brain is 5G. I figured, after reading about this a few years back that this technology would be harmful. The Japanese thought so, as did the Swede’s. Good ole USA, bring on the technology for the masses, no matter what it does to our health, gotta do what the CCP says. Right? Thanks for the heads up Jack and Dodie.

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply

      • Jack, Ima thinking about going tech-no-nuthin. Although, how would I get my blog post out? In the next few weeks, Momo and I are getting new internet service that is the old school 4 G or less, so maybe I can recuperate.

        Liked by 3 people

        Reply

        • You may not believe this, but CleverJourneys is all done by cell phone (well 95% as sometimes I take my laptop to the library).
          My son, the movie writer/director wrote his movie TIMETRAP totally by phone so it prompted me to do it. Now it is easier for me to type, etc. by phone vs computer (and Im a fast typist).

          Liked by 2 people

          Reply

          • Never would thave thought that. I can hardly text, but type real fast. I’m still scared of cell phones and shady folks stealing my personal information, and my soul, so I use mine for calls and pictures only.

            Liked by 2 people

            Reply

  2. They warned us, and I haven’t got any of it in the house, and I don’t think in the Rav 4, because it’s a 2020, but of course it’s in the air; there’s a cell tower or two or three in several directions. Those who set this stuff up, know it. Didn’t they do it as part of the suveillance they would access from the jab?

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  3. As a Licensed Amateur Radio Operator, when using a Handheld Radio, one is supposed to keep the Antenna as far from the head as possible, this is done by holding the radio in front of the face, with the antenna projecting away from the head, essentially being at almost 90° to the face.

    One of my Radios is the Yaesu VX-5R:
    The supplied FNB-58LI 7.2 V 1100 mAh Lithium-ion battery provides 5 watts out on 6M (50.000-54.000 MHz) and 2M (144 MHz to 148 MHz) and 4.5 watts on 440 MHz.

    6M, 2M, above, 6 Meter and 2 Meter, refer to the Wavelength, as the Frequency Increases, the Wavelength Decreases.

    Cellphones Transmit (according to a few websites) with 0.6 Watts to 3 Watts, this should vary based on need, higher wattage would drain the battery and if not needed, the phone likely uses a lower wattage to Transmit.

    The Higher the Frequency, the more damaging is the potential as far as living organisms are concerned. My handhelds transmit in the 440 MHz Range, tops, but Cellphones transmit in the 600 MHz to 2100 MHz range.

    “Is higher frequency electromagnetic radiation more harmful than lower frequency radiation?”

    The conclusion of the above question, on a Question and Answer Site, was that Higher Frequencies are more damaging than Lower Frequencies. The conclusion of other studies I glanced through seem to indicate the same, but researchers are less than objective, and often found that despite the principles of Higher Frequencies being more Damaging, there is no Proof of harm in Humans. These people are not researchers, they are (figuratively) paid consultants to the Cellphone Industry.

    I was overseeing several Headlamps worn by employees to find the ideal model to use. One had average output, but employees were complaining it was too bright. I observed one employee looking at the Headlamp, turning it on, then screaming about the brightness. I thought he was overreacting. Later, by accident, I turned on the Headlamp, observing the Rotation of the Lens that was required to Turn On the Headlamp, and I was exposed at close distance to the Light. It did indeed hurt, and, for hours afterwards, I had a Green Circle evident in my vision as I looked at various things. I had a Retinal Burn from a not overly bright Headlamp, how was that possible? Turns out that LEDs, if Improperly Designed, can cause Point Source Damage to the Retina. Simply put, the LED generates an immense amount of Light at a very tiny junction, and that intensity is potentially harmful. One model of light we had the Manufacturer had put a small pyramid of clear plastic above the LED, spreading out the Point Source of Light. Another avoided Point Source in other way. Yet to read American Research, although there’s a hypothetical possibility of Retinal or Eye Damage from LEDs, researchers have not found that to be the case. Really? I’ll testify in Court.

    My Cellphone, with the Protective Case, doesn’t work well held along side my head. My voice fails to reach the microphone, people complain of Drop Outs. So I use it in Speaker Mode (if Privacy is not needed), held in front of my face, top of the phone pointing away from my face, and me speaking to the Microphone on the bottom. It replicates the way one is to hold a Handheld Amateur Radio, with the Antenna away from the head. This should help to decrease damage to the brain, but the eyes would still be exposed. Bluetooth Headset, or Wire Connected Headset, may likewise decrease exposure to the Brain and Eyes.

    American Oversight Agencies are failing to oversee, they are corrupt, they are permitting far too much harm to happen to citizens here, I hope this is finally acknowledged and addressed one day.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  7. There is a big misconception that 5G is some evil frequency. 5G is a data transfer protocol as is 3G and 4G. Currently, 5G is using the same frequencies as 3G & 4G. Problem with 5G it needs a stronger signal to function at max data transfer rates. They are not to my knowledge increasing the power of existing cell sites, but adding more of them putting you closer to a cell site, therefore exposing you to stronger RF radiation. Hope this helps…

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.