Lone Star State of Mind

Texas Gov. Abbott, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Border Patrol Council Attack Biden Border Baby Formula Policy

A joint statement by Texas Governor Greg Abbott and National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) President Brandon Judd released Thursday, May 12, 2022, attacked the Biden Administration for providing baby formula to illegal immigrant holding facilities as American parents scramble amid a nationwide shortage of the product.  

“Children are our most vulnerable, precious Texans and deserve to be put first. Yet, President Biden has turned a blind eye to parents across America who are facing the nightmare of a nationwide baby formula shortage.”

“While mothers and fathers stare at empty grocery store shelves in a panic, the Biden Administration is happy to provide baby formula to illegal immigrants coming across our southern border. This is yet another one in a long line of reckless, out-of-touch priorities from the Biden Administration when it comes to securing our border and protecting Americans.” 

“Our children deserve a president who puts their needs and survival first – not one who gives critical supplies to illegal immigrants before the very people he took an oath to serve.” 

Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) also delivered remarks about Biden’s failures with the continual food security and pricing crisis. 

Greene identifies the origin and outcome of stress within the supply chain caused by government intervention into the overall system.  MTG then notes that FDA rules and regulations make supply interruptions worse.

Additionally, in the background of the federal DHS and HHS contracts for food products, including baby food/formula, most of those federal contracts contain a ‘first right‘ or ‘prioritized continuity‘ provision, creating a distribution outcome (via contractual mandate) where illegal aliens end up with preferential allocation.  

WATCH (2:55 mins):

Please Support These American Owned Businesses

___________________________

Get Your Natural Vitamins A & D from the Sea!

CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!
CLICK HERE for GOOD HEALTH!

___________________________

Now Available CLICK Here!
From award-winning Texas author Cynthia Leal Massey.
Free email notification when we post new articles.

4 replies »

  1. UGH, democrat politicians supporting Abortions, Late Term Abortions, Delivery Day Abortions, and now drafting Post Delivery Abortions (say 28 days after the baby is born), while obsessing about Spotted Owls and Salamanders. There can be no doubt that the left is completely insane, and that they already have measures in place to steal the next election, for no one, absolutely no one, would do the stupid things liberals do in a critical election year.

    Search Google or DuckDuckGo for this line, including Quotation Marks. The article is on the NY Post.

    “Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic”

    To show how insane Liberals are, the findings were widely cited claiming Conservatism was the Mental Disorder. Of course, Fact Checkers at the time conveniently failed to “Fact Check”. One merely needs to look at many liberals to understand they are as Mad (insane) as a Hatter. Mad as a Hatter came from the use of Mercury at one time in the manufacture of Hats, and I believe it was common to wet one’s hands with saliva and mercury to smooth the fabric, eventually producing insane hatters from exposure to the toxic substance.

    “”A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong.

    The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.

    “The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction.

    “The descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative.”””

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s